INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2785, 5, '2016-08-04 06:07:18', '2016-08-04 06:07:18', '<img class="size-full wp-image-2782 aligncenter" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-04-at-1.03.52-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 1.03.52 PM" width="720" height="143" />\r\n\r\nGerakBudaya and Asia Centre are pleased to announce the launch of a joint regional publications series which aims to focus upon the politics, history and culture of Southeast Asian societies.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nTogether we are launching a publications series on issues that matter to the peoples of the region.  The series will contribute to cross-disciplinary research and debate on the region and to highlighting new and innovative research on the region to a wider audience.\r\n\r\nManuscripts are welcome from contributors who are critically examining contemporary issues and would like to reach a wider audience.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Series</b>\r\n\r\nIn launching a Southeast Asian publication series we wish to understand the region in its broadest sense, not as a rigidly defined region but as also including those countries such as India and China which have always been important to its history and will be integral to its future.\r\n\r\nWe are therefore interested in intellectually sound manuscripts from across academic disciplines and from the policy sphere which speak to the wider region, which escape the confines of the nation-state and which highlight the transnational linkages and the historical ties which continue to structure present day Southeast Asia. As a guide, we welcome manuscripts in the following areas but we will happy to consider others:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>ASEAN and Regionalism</li>\r\n 	<li>Conflicts in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century</li>\r\n 	<li>Civil Society and Transnational Activism</li>\r\n 	<li>Democratization &amp; Authoritarianism</li>\r\n 	<li>Ethnic Relations</li>\r\n 	<li>Gender Studies</li>\r\n 	<li>Humanitarianism</li>\r\n 	<li>Human Rights</li>\r\n 	<li>Migration</li>\r\n 	<li>New Media</li>\r\n 	<li>Regional Arts &amp; Culture</li>\r\n 	<li>Sustainable Development</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nWe are also interested to publish manuscripts in the following formats:\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>1. Monographs</b>\r\n\r\nWe welcome a wide array of monographs. From academic research monographs to semi-academic and general non-fiction pieces by journalists and civil society activists. We are looking to publish pieces of original research which contribute something important to the scholarship on the region and which also talk to the work of civil society groups, NGOs and activists. We accept monographs of no longer than 40-100,000 words.\r\n\r\n<b>2. Edited Volumes</b>\r\n\r\nWe are interested to receive various proposals for edited volumes with a regional focus. In particular we are interested to publish edited volumes of no more than 12 chapters which bring together a diverse range of voices from around the region and neighbouring regions on topics of contemporary importance to Southeast Asia. We are happy to receive initial proposals for such volumes and work with editors in order to develop their proposal.\r\n\r\n<b>3. Conference Proceedings</b>\r\n\r\nWe are also interested to publish conference proceedings of important regional conferences which highlight cutting edge research and new and emerging perspectives on the region.\r\n\r\n<b>4. Self-Funded Publications</b>\r\n\r\nFinally we are interested in hearing from any individuals or organisations who have research funding or other such funding to contribute towards the cost of publishing research monographs, edited volumes and conference proceedings in keeping with our series specifications. This can be organised either as a self-publishing service, where GerakBudaya and Asia Centre will provide editing, production and distribution services, or as a co-publishing initiative in which the book will be jointly published by both parties.  Costs for book production can range from USD$ 1000–3500 depending on the length and nature of the manuscript and interested persons are encouraged to contact Series Editor James Gomez to find out more.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Series Editor</b>\r\n\r\nGerakBudaya and Asia Centre are proud to announce the appointment of Dr. James Gomez as the series editor of our Southeast Asian Studies series.\r\n\r\nDr. James Gomez is an academic, author and editor with over 20 years of international experience at universities, think-tanks, inter-governmental agencies and non-governmental organisations. He has worked with numerous publishers and serves on international advisory boards, editorial committees and as external resource person to academic departments, schools, faculties and universities.He is presently Professor of Communications and Associate Dean (International Affairs), School of Communication Arts, Bangkok University, Thailand. He is also Executive-Director of Asia Centre.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Submissions Procedure</b>\r\n\r\nIn order to consider your manuscript for publication we ask that you submit the following documents to us:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>1-page summary of the manuscript that outlines the number of pages or words.</li>\r\n 	<li>Contents page</li>\r\n 	<li>Estimated length of manuscript (current). (Estimate based on MS Word, 12 point font, Times New Roman or similar, 1 1/2 space;A4 size paper;inclusive of notes and appendices.)</li>\r\n 	<li>A sample of 20 to 30 pages, or the introduction and one chapter.</li>\r\n 	<li>A short biography of the author.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nFor edited volumes and conference proceedings we are happy to receive a provisional table of contents and a one page synopsis of the intended volume.\r\n\r\nPlease forward all submissions with a short covering letter to series editor Dr. James Gomez (<a href="mailto:james@asiacentre.co.th">james@asiacentre.co.th</a>). We aim to respond to your submission in 4-6 weeks.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Our Services</b>\r\n\r\nWe will be able to provide full editorial, production and distribution services. We are able to provide professional editors who can assist in developmental editing, copy-editing and proofreading of your manuscript and we will then provide layout design, printing, marketing and distribution services.\r\n\r\nIn addition we can also organise on your behalf co-publication initiatives with other international academic and non-academic presses and manage translation and territorial rights purchases to enable to your research to reach a wider audience.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>About Gerak Budaya</strong>\r\n\r\nGerakBudaya has long been established in Malaysia as a publisher and distributor of titles embodying social awareness, critical perspectives and the hidden histories of Malaysia and the wider region. Under their SIRD imprint, they have established a major non-university publishing house with titles covering a wide range of academic disciplines from history to political science, economics, cultural studies and sociology.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Southeast Asian Studies Series – Call for Manuscripts', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2778-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-04 06:07:18', '2016-08-04 06:07:18', '', 2778, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2778-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2786, 5, '2016-08-04 06:09:47', '2016-08-04 06:09:47', '<img class="size-full wp-image-2782 aligncenter" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-04-at-1.03.52-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 1.03.52 PM" width="720" height="143" />\r\n\r\nGerakBudaya and Asia Centre are pleased to announce the launch of a joint regional publications series which aims to focus upon the politics, history and culture of Southeast Asian societies.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nTogether we are launching a publications series on issues that matter to the peoples of the region.  The series will contribute to cross-disciplinary research and debate on the region and to highlighting new and innovative research on the region to a wider audience.\r\n\r\nManuscripts are welcome from contributors who are critically examining contemporary issues and would like to reach a wider audience.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Series</b>\r\n\r\nIn launching a Southeast Asian publication series we wish to understand the region in its broadest sense, not as a rigidly defined region but as also including those countries such as India and China which have always been important to its history and will be integral to its future.\r\n\r\nWe are therefore interested in intellectually sound manuscripts from across academic disciplines and from the policy sphere which speak to the wider region, which escape the confines of the nation-state and which highlight the transnational linkages and the historical ties which continue to structure present day Southeast Asia. As a guide, we welcome manuscripts in the following areas but we will happy to consider others:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>ASEAN and Regionalism</li>\r\n 	<li>Conflicts in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century</li>\r\n 	<li>Civil Society and Transnational Activism</li>\r\n 	<li>Democratization &amp; Authoritarianism</li>\r\n 	<li>Ethnic Relations</li>\r\n 	<li>Gender Studies</li>\r\n 	<li>Humanitarianism</li>\r\n 	<li>Human Rights</li>\r\n 	<li>Migration</li>\r\n 	<li>New Media</li>\r\n 	<li>Regional Arts &amp; Culture</li>\r\n 	<li>Sustainable Development</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nWe are also interested to publish manuscripts in the following formats:\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>1. Monographs</b>\r\n\r\nWe welcome a wide array of monographs. From academic research monographs to semi-academic and general non-fiction pieces by journalists and civil society activists. We are looking to publish pieces of original research which contribute something important to the scholarship on the region and which also talk to the work of civil society groups, NGOs and activists. We accept monographs of no longer than 40-100,000 words.\r\n\r\n<b>2. Edited Volumes</b>\r\n\r\nWe are interested to receive various proposals for edited volumes with a regional focus. In particular we are interested to publish edited volumes of no more than 12 chapters which bring together a diverse range of voices from around the region and neighbouring regions on topics of contemporary importance to Southeast Asia. We are happy to receive initial proposals for such volumes and work with editors in order to develop their proposal.\r\n\r\n<b>3. Conference Proceedings</b>\r\n\r\nWe are also interested to publish conference proceedings of important regional conferences which highlight cutting edge research and new and emerging perspectives on the region.\r\n\r\n<b>4. Self-Funded Publications</b>\r\n\r\nFinally we are interested in hearing from any individuals or organisations who have research funding or other such funding to contribute towards the cost of publishing research monographs, edited volumes and conference proceedings in keeping with our series specifications. This can be organised either as a self-publishing service, where GerakBudaya and Asia Centre will provide editing, production and distribution services, or as a co-publishing initiative in which the book will be jointly published by both parties.  Costs for book production can range from USD$ 1000–3500 depending on the length and nature of the manuscript and interested persons are encouraged to contact Series Editor James Gomez to find out more.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Series Editor</b>\r\n\r\nGerakBudaya and Asia Centre are proud to announce the appointment of Dr. James Gomez as the series editor of our Southeast Asian Studies series.\r\n\r\nDr. James Gomez is an academic, author and editor with over 20 years of international experience at universities, think-tanks, inter-governmental agencies and non-governmental organisations. He has worked with numerous publishers and serves on international advisory boards, editorial committees and as external resource person to academic departments, schools, faculties and universities.He is presently Professor of Communications and Associate Dean (International Affairs), School of Communication Arts, Bangkok University, Thailand. He is also Executive-Director of Asia Centre.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Submissions Procedure</b>\r\n\r\nIn order to consider your manuscript for publication we ask that you submit the following documents to us:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>1-page summary of the manuscript that outlines the number of pages or words.</li>\r\n 	<li>Contents page</li>\r\n 	<li>Estimated length of manuscript (current). (Estimate based on MS Word, 12 point font, Times New Roman or similar, 1 1/2 space;A4 size paper;inclusive of notes and appendices.)</li>\r\n 	<li>A sample of 20 to 30 pages, or the introduction and one chapter.</li>\r\n 	<li>A short biography of the author.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nFor edited volumes and conference proceedings we are happy to receive a provisional table of contents and a one page synopsis of the intended volume.\r\n\r\nPlease forward all submissions with a short covering letter to series editor Dr. James Gomez (<a href="mailto:james@asiacentre.co.th">james@asiacentre.co.th</a>). We aim to respond to your submission in 4-6 weeks.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Our Services</b>\r\n\r\nWe will be able to provide full editorial, production and distribution services. We are able to provide professional editors who can assist in developmental editing, copy-editing and proofreading of your manuscript and we will then provide layout design, printing, marketing and distribution services.\r\n\r\nIn addition we can also organise on your behalf co-publication initiatives with other international academic and non-academic presses and manage translation and territorial rights purchases to enable to your research to reach a wider audience.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>About Gerak Budaya</strong>\r\n\r\nGerakBudaya has long been established in Malaysia as a publisher and distributor of titles embodying social awareness, critical perspectives and the hidden histories of Malaysia and the wider region. Under their SIRD imprint, they have established a major non-university publishing house with titles covering a wide range of academic disciplines from history to political science, economics, cultural studies and sociology.\r\n\r\nTo learn more about the Asia Centre - Gerak Budaya partnership, please click<a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/other/asia-centre-regional-representative-for-malaysian-publisher-gerakbudaya/" target="_blank"> here</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Southeast Asian Studies Series – Call for Manuscripts', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2778-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-04 06:09:47', '2016-08-04 06:09:47', '', 2778, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2778-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2788, 5, '2016-08-05 03:10:42', '0000-00-00 00:00:00', '<div class="page" title="Page 1">\n<div class="section">\n<div class="layoutArea"></div>\n<div class="layoutArea"></div>\n<div class="layoutArea">\n<div class="column">\n\nThis course is designed to introduce students to the media landscape in Asia. In particular students will be acquainted with media practices, developments in law, technology and the critical issues that are shaping media policy. Students will be shown how media policy and practices are affected by socio­economic factors, cultural context, style of governance and technology. As part of the course students will be expected to engage in practical media tasks to develop their professional skills including writing, reporting and disseminating information to media outlets. Students can choose to focus on an Asian sub­region of choice.\n\n&nbsp;\n\n<strong>Course Objectives</strong>\n<ul>\n 	<li>Provide students with an appreciation of the Asian media landscape.</li>\n 	<li>Review laws, governance frameworks, socio­economic and cultural contexts that impact media policy and practices.</li>\n 	<li>Assess the impact of digital media on societies and individual behaviour.</li>\n 	<li>Equip students with skills to execute a communications research project.</li>\n 	<li>Enable student to hone and apply their professional skills through practical assignments.</li>\n</ul>\n&nbsp;\n\n<strong>Learning Outcomes</strong>\n\nAt the end of this course students will be able to:\n<ul>\n 	<li>Be familiar with key developments and issues facing the Asian media landscape.</li>\n 	<li>Understand media policy and practices in their historical, socio­cultural, economic and political contexts.</li>\n 	<li>Understand how digital media impacts the way in which the media in Asia operates.</li>\n 	<li>Acquire practical experience in executing a communications research project.</li>\n 	<li>Improve media related professional skills and competencies.</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n<div class="column">\n\n<strong>Methods of Delivery</strong>\n\nThe course will be delivered using a mixture of lecture, discussion and opportunities for experiential learning. Case studies will be employed to help students develop a contextual appreciation of the factors that can impact Asian media policy and practices. Most of the instruction and advising will take place on­site at the Asia Centre’s facilities and will be conducted by Centre Associates and Partners who are experts in the field of media and communications. The course will also provide a number of opportunities for students to improve their presentation, research and professional skills through activities like leading in­class discussions and project work. This will be complemented by visits to media NGOs, clubs and press houses, opportunities to interact and network with leading journalists and foreign correspondents, freedom of expression advocates, as well as students and instructors in media and communications programmes in selected Bangkok based universities. Students will also get a taste of the real life press experience by attending and reporting on press conferences and conducting interviews with experts in the field.\n\n</div>\nThis Media &amp; Communications Workshop is part of Asia Centre''s International Education Programme. To learn more about the International Education Programme click <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/intl-education-programme/" target="_blank">here</a>.\n\n</div>\n</div>\n</div>', 'Media & Communications Workshop', '', 'draft', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'media-communications-workshop', '', '', '2016-08-05 03:10:42', '2016-08-05 03:10:42', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/?p=2788', 0, 'post', '', 0),
(2789, 5, '2016-08-05 03:10:25', '2016-08-05 03:10:25', '<div class="page" title="Page 1">\r\n<div class="section">\r\n<div class="layoutArea"></div>\r\n<div class="layoutArea"></div>\r\n<div class="layoutArea">\r\n<div class="column">\r\n\r\nThis course is designed to introduce students to the media landscape in Asia. In particular students will be acquainted with media practices, developments in law, technology and the critical issues that are shaping media policy. Students will be shown how media policy and practices are affected by socio­economic factors, cultural context, style of governance and technology. As part of the course students will be expected to engage in practical media tasks to develop their professional skills including writing, reporting and disseminating information to media outlets. Students can choose to focus on an Asian sub­region of choice.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Course Objectives</strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Provide students with an appreciation of the Asian media landscape.</li>\r\n 	<li>Review laws, governance frameworks, socio­economic and cultural contexts that impact media policy and practices.</li>\r\n 	<li>Assess the impact of digital media on societies and individual behaviour.</li>\r\n 	<li>Equip students with skills to execute a communications research project.</li>\r\n 	<li>Enable student to hone and apply their professional skills through practical assignments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Learning Outcomes</strong>\r\n\r\nAt the end of this course students will be able to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Be familiar with key developments and issues facing the Asian media landscape.</li>\r\n 	<li>Understand media policy and practices in their historical, socio­cultural, economic and political contexts.</li>\r\n 	<li>Understand how digital media impacts the way in which the media in Asia operates.</li>\r\n 	<li>Acquire practical experience in executing a communications research project.</li>\r\n 	<li>Improve media related professional skills and competencies.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n<div class="column">\r\n\r\n<strong>Methods of Delivery</strong>\r\n\r\nThe course will be delivered using a mixture of lecture, discussion and opportunities for experiential learning. Case studies will be employed to help students develop a contextual appreciation of the factors that can impact Asian media policy and practices. Most of the instruction and advising will take place on­site at the Asia Centre’s facilities and will be conducted by Centre Associates and Partners who are experts in the field of media and communications. The course will also provide a number of opportunities for students to improve their presentation, research and professional skills through activities like leading in­class discussions and project work. This will be complemented by visits to media NGOs, clubs and press houses, opportunities to interact and network with leading journalists and foreign correspondents, freedom of expression advocates, as well as students and instructors in media and communications programmes in selected Bangkok based universities. Students will also get a taste of the real life press experience by attending and reporting on press conferences and conducting interviews with experts in the field.\r\n\r\n</div>\r\nThis Media &amp; Communications Workshop is part of Asia Centre''s International Education Programme. To learn more about the International Education Programme click <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/intl-education-programme/" target="_blank">here</a>.\r\n\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>', 'Media & Communications Workshop', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2788-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-05 03:10:25', '2016-08-05 03:10:25', '', 2788, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2788-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2790, 5, '2016-08-05 04:05:11', '2016-08-05 04:05:11', '<div class="column">\r\n\r\n<img class="alignright" src="http://www2.wlv.ac.uk/webteam/email-images/fa/media_pr.jpg" width="335" height="298" />This course is designed to introduce students to the media landscape in Asia.\r\n\r\nIn particular students will be acquainted with media practices, developments in law, technology and the critical issues that are shaping media policy.\r\n\r\nStudents will be shown how media policy and practices are affected by socio­economic factors, cultural context, style of governance and technology.\r\n\r\nAs part of the course students will be expected to engage in practical media tasks to develop their professional skills including writing, reporting and disseminating information to media outlets. Students can choose to focus on an Asian sub­region of choice.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Course Objectives</strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Provide students with an appreciation of the Asian media landscape.</li>\r\n 	<li>Review laws, governance frameworks, socio­economic and cultural contexts that impact media policy and practices.</li>\r\n 	<li>Assess the impact of digital media on societies and individual behaviour.</li>\r\n 	<li>Equip students with skills to execute a communications research project.</li>\r\n 	<li>Enable student to hone and apply their professional skills through practical assignments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Learning Outcomes</strong>\r\n\r\nAt the end of this course students will be able to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Be familiar with key developments and issues facing the Asian media landscape.</li>\r\n 	<li>Understand media policy and practices in their historical, socio­cultural, economic and political contexts.</li>\r\n 	<li>Understand how digital media impacts the way in which the media in Asia operates.</li>\r\n 	<li>Acquire practical experience in executing a communications research project.</li>\r\n 	<li>Improve media related professional skills and competencies.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Methods of Delivery</strong>\r\n\r\n</div>\r\n<div class="column">\r\n\r\nThe course will be delivered using a mixture of lecture, discussion and opportunities for experiential learning. Case studies will be employed to help students develop a contextual appreciation of the factors that can impact Asian media policy and practices. Most of the instruction and advising will take place on­site at the Asia Centre’s facilities and will be conducted by Centre Associates and Partners who are experts in the field of media and communications. The course will also provide a number of opportunities for students to improve their presentation, research and professional skills through activities like leading in­class discussions and project work. This will be complemented by visits to media NGOs, clubs and press houses, opportunities to interact and network with leading journalists and foreign correspondents, freedom of expression advocates, as well as students and instructors in media and communications programmes in selected Bangkok based universities. Students will also get a taste of the real life press experience by attending and reporting on press conferences and conducting interviews with experts in the field.\r\n\r\n</div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Modules </strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Introduction to the Asian Medial Landscape.</li>\r\n 	<li>Media Policy in Asia.</li>\r\n 	<li>Digital Medial in Asia.</li>\r\n 	<li>Designing a Communications Research Project.</li>\r\n 	<li>Introduction to Asian Sub-Regions</li>\r\n 	<li>Professional Skills</li>\r\n 	<li>Media &amp; Advocacy</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nThe workshop will also include student directed seminars.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Course Fees</strong>\r\n\r\nUSD$450\r\n\r\nThe course fee cover i<span style="font-weight: 400;">nstruction &amp; materials, w</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">eekday lunch &amp;  tea-breaks and a w</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">elcome dinner.</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Students will be expected to bear their owns costs for the following:</span>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Flight ticket &amp; airport transfer </span></li>\r\n 	<li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">All local travel for activities and site visits (by public transport)</span></li>\r\n 	<li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Entrance fees for special events</span></li>\r\n 	<li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dinner on all days (Except for Welcome Dinner on the first night)</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Registration</strong>\r\n\r\nTo register please email us at contact@asiacentre.co.th\r\n\r\nDeadline for registration is 30 August 2016.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis Media &amp; Communications Workshop is part of Asia Centre''s International Education Programme. To learn more about the International Education Programme click <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/intl-education-programme/" target="_blank">here</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Media & Communications Workshop', '', 'publish', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2790', '', '', '2016-12-22 06:47:35', '2016-12-22 06:47:35', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/?post_type=event&#038;p=2790', 0, 'event', '', 0),
(2791, 5, '2016-08-05 03:52:38', '2016-08-05 03:52:38', '', 'Screen Shot 2016-08-05 at 10.52.16 AM', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'screen-shot-2016-08-05-at-10-52-16-am', '', '', '2016-08-05 03:52:38', '2016-08-05 03:52:38', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-05-at-10.52.16-AM.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2793, 6, '2016-08-05 05:51:26', '2016-08-05 05:51:26', 'Asia Centre offers meeting services at its boutique and cosy facilities conveniently located in the heart of Bangkok, 20 metres away from Phayathai BTS and Airport Link. Our spaces are perfect for private meetings, conferences, training workshops, networking sessions and other boutique events such as book launches, readings, screenings, etc.\r\n\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n\r\n<strong>We can host up to 40 (seating) and 60 (seating and standing). The following are available:</strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Flexible room layouts (networking, theatre, classroom, round table, boardroom)</li>\r\n 	<li>High-speed internet access, Skype video-conferencing, computers</li>\r\n 	<li>AV Equipment: flat-screen TV, projector, screen, wireless microphones, etc.</li>\r\n 	<li>Private lockers and lounge area</li>\r\n 	<li>Pantry with microwave, kettle, hot/cold water dispenser and fridge</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nOur services are competitively priced and low cost catering can be arranged through advanced booking. Additional on-demand meeting services include printing, photocopying and secretarial support.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>For more information in Thai please visit our Thai Facebook page</strong>\r\n\r\n<a href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.rental">https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.rental</a>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[button style="btn-info" size="btn-md" label="Book Now" link="#bookingform" link_opens="_self"]\r\n\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n\r\n<strong>WEEKDAY RATES</strong>\r\n<table class="table table-striped" style="height: 292px;" width="746">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Room Type</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><strong>1 hour</strong></td>\r\n<td width="84"><strong>Half day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="78"><strong>Full day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"><strong>Evening</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong> </strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><em>Min.3 hrs\r\n</em><em>(8-5pm) </em></td>\r\n<td width="84">08.00-12.00\r\nor 13.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="78">08.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="73">17.00-21.00</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Seminar Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">1,400</td>\r\n<td width="84">4,000</td>\r\n<td width="78">7,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">6,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Discussion room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">750</td>\r\n<td width="84">1,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">2,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Both Rooms</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">1,500</td>\r\n<td width="84">4,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">7,000</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong>WEEKEND AND PUBLIC HOLIDAY RATES </strong>\r\n<table class="table table-striped" width="441">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Room Type</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><strong>1 hour</strong></td>\r\n<td width="84"><strong>Half day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="78"><strong>Full day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"><strong>Evening</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong> </strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><em>Min.3 hrs\r\n</em><em>(8-5pm)</em></td>\r\n<td width="84">08.00-12.00\r\nor 13.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="78">08.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="73">17.00-21.00</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Seminar Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">2,400</td>\r\n<td width="84">7,000</td>\r\n<td width="78">14,000</td>\r\n<td width="73">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Discussion Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">NA</td>\r\n<td width="84">NA</td>\r\n<td width="78">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Both Rooms</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">2,800</td>\r\n<td width="84">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">16,000</td>\r\n<td width="73">10,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<h3><strong>Room Capacity</strong></h3>\r\n<table class="table table-striped">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style="text-align: left;" width="76"><strong>Layout</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="75"><strong>Theatre</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="79"><strong>Classroom*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81"><strong>Round Table*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81"><strong>Boardroom*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="59"><strong>Discussion Room</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="76"><strong>Number </strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="75">40</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="79">30</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81">24</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81">15</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="59">4</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n* Additional chairs available on request\r\n<h3><strong>Office Suite</strong></h3>\r\nWe also have an office suite that accommodates two working stations, which can be equipped as required.\r\n<table class="table table-striped">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Office Suite</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50"><strong>Weekly</strong></td>\r\n<td width="54"><strong>Monthly</strong></td>\r\n<td width="44"><strong>Yearly</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Full Unit (3 desks)</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50">10,000</td>\r\n<td width="54">30,000</td>\r\n<td width="44">25,000</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Sharing (1 desk)</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50">3,000</td>\r\n<td width="54">10,000</td>\r\n<td width="44">8,000</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"></td>\r\n<td width="50"></td>\r\n<td width="54"></td>\r\n<td width="44"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong>REMARKS: </strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>All Rate in Thai Baht. Rates are subjected to 7% VAT. Rate are subjected to change without prior notice.</li>\r\n 	<li>Full advance payment to confirm booking.</li>\r\n 	<li>Seminar Room Service: Price included use of Projector, Sound system, Wi-Fi internet, Hot/ Cold water dispenser.</li>\r\n 	<li>Catering started from 80 Baht/Person (3 in 1 Coffee + drinking water + 1 Snack, additional snack 30 Baht/pc.) 7 days advanced booking and minimum order 30 pax.</li>\r\n 	<li>A 500 Baht cleaning fee will be charged to self-catering events.</li>\r\n 	<li>Events that exceed the booking time by more than 15 minutes will be charged an additional full hour rate.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<a name="bookingform"></a>\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n<h1><strong>Space Booking Form</strong></h1>\r\n[formidable id=3]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Spaces', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '1918-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-05 05:51:26', '2016-08-05 05:51:26', '', 1918, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/1918-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2794, 6, '2016-08-10 02:29:37', '2016-08-10 02:29:37', 'Asia Centre is conveniently located at the 17<sup>th</sup> floor of Phayathai Plaza Building off the BTS\r\nPhayathai and Airport Link stations in Central Bangkok.\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Take either the BTS or Airport Link and stop at Phayathai station</li>\r\n 	<li>Go out through Exit 1 and walk down the stairs</li>\r\n 	<li>At the bottom of the stairs turn left and walk 50m along the pavement towards Rachatewi BTS</li>\r\n 	<li>Phayathai Plaza Building will be on your right, enter the building and walk towards the back</li>\r\n 	<li>At the back towards the right, take the elevators serving floors 17-27</li>\r\n 	<li>Alight on the 17<sup>th</sup> floor and turn left, you will arrive at the Asia Centre</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>วิธีการเดินทาง</strong>\r\n\r\nAsia Centre ตั้งอยู่ในตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า ชั้น 17 ติดบีทีเอส และ แอร์พอร์ต ลิงค์ สถานีพญาไท\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>ลงที่ สถานี พญาไท ทางออก 1</li>\r\n 	<li>ลงบันได และเดินย้อนขึ้นมาทางซ้ายมือ (ไปพารากอน/ บีทีเอสราชเทวี)</li>\r\n 	<li>ประมาณ 20 เมตร ก็จะเห็นตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า อยู่ทางขวามือ</li>\r\n 	<li>เดินเข้าไปในตึก ผ่านธนาคารกรุงเทพ จนถึงลิฟต์ด้านใน ให้ใช้ลิฟต์แถวกลาง เป็นลิฟต์ที่ใช้สำหรับชั้น <span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>17-27</strong></span></li>\r\n 	<li>กดลิฟต์ชั้น 17 ซึ่งจอดเป็นชั้นแรก</li>\r\n 	<li>ออกจากลิฟต์ชั้น 17 เลี้ยวซ้าย ก็จะถึง <strong><a class="profileLink" href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.co.th/" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/page.php?id=284220758263826">ASIA Centre</a> </strong>อยู่ในตำแหน่งที่ 2 ทางด้านซ้ายมือ</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_show"></div>\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2541" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Direction-to-Asia-Centre-1-1140x530.jpg" alt="Direction to Asia Centre" width="1140" height="530" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Parking</strong>\r\n\r\nHourly parking is available at Phayathai Plaza Building. Visitor parking are at the free gear lots on every floor or regular lots at the 10 floor. Visitors can enjoy two hour free parking with the Asia Centre stamp. Another option is to park at Siam Paragon or Central World and take the BTS to Phayathai station.\r\n\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2217" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Car-Park-PP-1140x420.jpg" alt="Car Park PP" width="1140" height="420" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Please refer to the map below for a location overview.</strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[wpgmza id="1"]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Location', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2064-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-10 02:29:37', '2016-08-10 02:29:37', '', 2064, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2064-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2795, 6, '2016-08-10 02:39:36', '2016-08-10 02:39:36', 'Asia Centre is conveniently located at the 17<sup>th</sup> floor of Phayathai Plaza Building off the BTS\r\nPhayathai and Airport Link stations in Central Bangkok.\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Take either the BTS or Airport Link and stop at Phayathai station</li>\r\n 	<li>Go out through Exit 1 and walk down the stairs</li>\r\n 	<li>At the bottom of the stairs turn left and walk 50m along the pavement towards Rachatewi BTS</li>\r\n 	<li>Phayathai Plaza Building will be on your right, enter the building and walk towards the back</li>\r\n 	<li>At the back towards the right, take the elevators serving floors 17-27</li>\r\n 	<li>Alight on the 17<sup>th</sup> floor and turn left, you will arrive at the Asia Centre</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>วิธีการเดินทาง</strong>\r\n\r\nAsia Centre ตั้งอยู่ในตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า ชั้น 17 ติดบีทีเอส และ แอร์พอร์ต ลิงค์ สถานีพญาไท\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>ลงที่ สถานี พญาไท ทางออก 1</li>\r\n 	<li>ลงบันได และเดินย้อนขึ้นมาทางซ้ายมือ (ไปพารากอน/ บีทีเอสราชเทวี)</li>\r\n 	<li>ประมาณ 20 เมตร ก็จะเห็นตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า อยู่ทางขวามือ</li>\r\n 	<li>เดินเข้าไปในตึก ผ่านธนาคารกรุงเทพ จนถึงลิฟต์ด้านใน ให้ใช้ลิฟต์แถวกลาง เป็นลิฟต์ที่ใช้สำหรับชั้น <span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>17-27</strong></span></li>\r\n 	<li>กดลิฟต์ชั้น 17 ซึ่งจอดเป็นชั้นแรก</li>\r\n 	<li>ออกจากลิฟต์ชั้น 17 เลี้ยวซ้าย ก็จะถึง <strong><a class="profileLink" href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.co.th/" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/page.php?id=284220758263826">ASIA Centre</a> </strong>อยู่ในตำแหน่งที่ 2 ทางด้านซ้ายมือ</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_show"></div>\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2541" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Direction-to-Asia-Centre-1-1140x530.jpg" alt="Direction to Asia Centre" width="1140" height="530" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Parking</strong>\r\n\r\nHourly parking is available at Phayathai Plaza Building. Visitor parking are at the free gear lots on every floor or regular lots at the 10 floor. Visitors can enjoy two hour free parking with the Asia Centre stamp. Another option is to park at Siam Paragon or Central World and take the BTS to Phayathai station.\r\n\r\nParking Rates:\r\n1) Visitors are entitled to 15 min of free parking\r\n2) Asia Centre 1 stamp entitles you to 2 hours free parking, thereafter 30 baht/hour\r\n3) Extended parking (2 stamps)\r\nDay Rate : 100 bath for parking between 07:00-19:00 PM\r\nNight Rate: 60 baht for parking between 19:01-06.59 PM.\r\nSaturday &amp; Sunday Rate: 50 baht for 24 hours\r\n\r\nPlease retain your parking coupon as you will need to get stamps from Asia Centre to enjoy these parking rates.\r\n\r\nที่จอดรถ\r\n- จอดรถในช่องขวางและปลดเกียร์ว่างได้ทุกชั้น\r\n- จอดรถในช่องจอดรถได้ในชั้น 10\r\n\r\nอัตราค่าที่จอดรถ<span class="text_exposed_show">\r\n1. รถผู้มาติดต่อ จอดฟรี 15 นาทีแรก\r\n2. มี 1 ตราประทับ จอดฟรี 2 ชั่วโมงแรก ต่อไปคิด 30 บาท/ชั่วโมง\r\n3. มี 2 ตราประทับ\r\nกลางวัน 07:00-19:00 น. เหมาจ่าย 100 บาท\r\nกลางคืน 19:01-06.59 น. เหมาจ่าย 60 บาท\r\nเสาร์, อาทิตย์ เหมาจ่าย 24 ชั่วโมง 50 บาท</span>\r\n\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2217" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Car-Park-PP-1140x420.jpg" alt="Car Park PP" width="1140" height="420" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Please refer to the map below for a location overview.</strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[wpgmza id="1"]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Location', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2064-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-10 02:39:36', '2016-08-10 02:39:36', '', 2064, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2064-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2797, 6, '2016-08-10 02:58:01', '2016-08-10 02:58:01', 'Asia Centre is conveniently located at the 17<sup>th</sup> floor of Phayathai Plaza Building off the BTS\r\nPhayathai and Airport Link stations in Central Bangkok.\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Take either the BTS or Airport Link and stop at Phayathai station</li>\r\n 	<li>Go out through Exit 1 and walk down the stairs</li>\r\n 	<li>At the bottom of the stairs turn left and walk 50m along the pavement towards Rachatewi BTS</li>\r\n 	<li>Phayathai Plaza Building will be on your right, enter the building and walk towards the back</li>\r\n 	<li>At the back towards the right, take the elevators serving floors 17-27</li>\r\n 	<li>Alight on the 17<sup>th</sup> floor and turn left, you will arrive at the Asia Centre</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>วิธีการเดินทาง</strong>\r\n\r\nAsia Centre ตั้งอยู่ในตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า ชั้น 17 ติดบีทีเอส และ แอร์พอร์ต ลิงค์ สถานีพญาไท\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>ลงที่ สถานี พญาไท ทางออก 1</li>\r\n 	<li>ลงบันได และเดินย้อนขึ้นมาทางซ้ายมือ (ไปพารากอน/ บีทีเอสราชเทวี)</li>\r\n 	<li>ประมาณ 20 เมตร ก็จะเห็นตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า อยู่ทางขวามือ</li>\r\n 	<li>เดินเข้าไปในตึก ผ่านธนาคารกรุงเทพ จนถึงลิฟต์ด้านใน ให้ใช้ลิฟต์แถวกลาง เป็นลิฟต์ที่ใช้สำหรับชั้น <span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>17-27</strong></span></li>\r\n 	<li>กดลิฟต์ชั้น 17 ซึ่งจอดเป็นชั้นแรก</li>\r\n 	<li>ออกจากลิฟต์ชั้น 17 เลี้ยวซ้าย ก็จะถึง <strong><a class="profileLink" href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.co.th/" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/page.php?id=284220758263826">ASIA Centre</a> </strong>อยู่ในตำแหน่งที่ 2 ทางด้านซ้ายมือ</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_show"></div>\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2541" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Direction-to-Asia-Centre-1-1140x530.jpg" alt="Direction to Asia Centre" width="1140" height="530" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Parking</strong>\r\n\r\nHourly parking is available at Phayathai Plaza Building. Visitor parking are at the free gear lots on every floor or regular lots at the 10 floor. Visitors can enjoy two hour free parking with the Asia Centre stamp. Another option is to park at Siam Paragon or Central World and take the BTS to Phayathai station.\r\n\r\nParking Rates:\r\n1) Visitors are entitled to 15 min of free parking\r\n2) Asia Centre 1 stamp entitles you to 2 hours free parking, thereafter 30 baht/hour\r\n3) Extended parking (2 stamps)\r\nDay Rate : 100 bath for parking between 07:00-19:00 PM\r\nNight Rate: 60 baht for parking between 19:01-06.59 PM.\r\nSaturday &amp; Sunday Rate: 50 baht for 24 hours\r\n\r\nPlease retain your parking coupon as you will need to get stamps from Asia Centre to enjoy these parking rates.\r\n\r\nที่จอดรถ\r\n- จอดรถในช่องขวางและปลดเกียร์ว่างได้ทุกชั้น\r\n- จอดรถในช่องจอดรถได้ในชั้น 10\r\n\r\nอัตราค่าที่จอดรถ<span class="text_exposed_show">\r\n1. รถผู้มาติดต่อ จอดฟรี 15 นาทีแรก\r\n2. มี 1 ตราประทับ จอดฟรี 2 ชั่วโมงแรก ต่อไปคิด 30 บาท/ชั่วโมง\r\n3. มี 2 ตราประทับ\r\nกลางวัน 07:00-19:00 น. เหมาจ่าย 100 บาท\r\nกลางคืน 19:01-06.59 น. เหมาจ่าย 60 บาท\r\nเสาร์, อาทิตย์ เหมาจ่าย 24 ชั่วโมง 50 บาท</span>\r\n\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2217" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Car-Park-PP-1140x420.jpg" alt="Car Park PP" width="1140" height="420" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Please refer to the map below for a location overview.</strong>\r\n\r\n<img class="alignnone wp-image-2796" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Asia-Centre-Map.jpg" alt="Asia Centre Map" width="610" height="556" />\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[wpgmza id="1"]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Location', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2064-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-10 02:58:01', '2016-08-10 02:58:01', '', 2064, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2064-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2798, 6, '2016-08-10 03:01:24', '2016-08-10 03:01:24', 'Asia Centre is conveniently located at the 17<sup>th</sup> floor of Phayathai Plaza Building off the BTS\r\nPhayathai and Airport Link stations in Central Bangkok.\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Take either the BTS or Airport Link and stop at Phayathai station</li>\r\n 	<li>Go out through Exit 1 and walk down the stairs</li>\r\n 	<li>At the bottom of the stairs turn left and walk 50m along the pavement towards Rachatewi BTS</li>\r\n 	<li>Phayathai Plaza Building will be on your right, enter the building and walk towards the back</li>\r\n 	<li>At the back towards the right, take the elevators serving floors 17-27</li>\r\n 	<li>Alight on the 17<sup>th</sup> floor and turn left, you will arrive at the Asia Centre</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>วิธีการเดินทาง</strong>\r\n\r\nAsia Centre ตั้งอยู่ในตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า ชั้น 17 ติดบีทีเอส และ แอร์พอร์ต ลิงค์ สถานีพญาไท\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>ลงที่ สถานี พญาไท ทางออก 1</li>\r\n 	<li>ลงบันได และเดินย้อนขึ้นมาทางซ้ายมือ (ไปพารากอน/ บีทีเอสราชเทวี)</li>\r\n 	<li>ประมาณ 20 เมตร ก็จะเห็นตึกพญาไท พลาซ่า อยู่ทางขวามือ</li>\r\n 	<li>เดินเข้าไปในตึก ผ่านธนาคารกรุงเทพ จนถึงลิฟต์ด้านใน ให้ใช้ลิฟต์แถวกลาง เป็นลิฟต์ที่ใช้สำหรับชั้น <span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>17-27</strong></span></li>\r\n 	<li>กดลิฟต์ชั้น 17 ซึ่งจอดเป็นชั้นแรก</li>\r\n 	<li>ออกจากลิฟต์ชั้น 17 เลี้ยวซ้าย ก็จะถึง <strong><a class="profileLink" href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.co.th/" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/page.php?id=284220758263826">ASIA Centre</a> </strong>อยู่ในตำแหน่งที่ 2 ทางด้านซ้ายมือ</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_show"></div>\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2541" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Direction-to-Asia-Centre-1-1140x530.jpg" alt="Direction to Asia Centre" width="1140" height="530" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Parking</strong>\r\n\r\nHourly parking is available at Phayathai Plaza Building. Visitor parking are at the free gear lots on every floor or regular lots at the 10 floor. Visitors can enjoy two hour free parking with the Asia Centre stamp. Another option is to park at Siam Paragon or Central World and take the BTS to Phayathai station.\r\n\r\nParking Rates:\r\n1) Visitors are entitled to 15 min of free parking\r\n2) Asia Centre 1 stamp entitles you to 2 hours free parking, thereafter 30 baht/hour\r\n3) Extended parking (2 stamps)\r\nDay Rate : 100 bath for parking between 07:00-19:00 PM\r\nNight Rate: 60 baht for parking between 19:01-06.59 PM.\r\nSaturday &amp; Sunday Rate: 50 baht for 24 hours\r\n\r\nPlease retain your parking coupon as you will need to get stamps from Asia Centre to enjoy these parking rates.\r\n\r\nที่จอดรถ\r\n- จอดรถในช่องขวางและปลดเกียร์ว่างได้ทุกชั้น\r\n- จอดรถในช่องจอดรถได้ในชั้น 10\r\n\r\nอัตราค่าที่จอดรถ<span class="text_exposed_show">\r\n1. รถผู้มาติดต่อ จอดฟรี 15 นาทีแรก\r\n2. มี 1 ตราประทับ จอดฟรี 2 ชั่วโมงแรก ต่อไปคิด 30 บาท/ชั่วโมง\r\n3. มี 2 ตราประทับ\r\nกลางวัน 07:00-19:00 น. เหมาจ่าย 100 บาท\r\nกลางคืน 19:01-06.59 น. เหมาจ่าย 60 บาท\r\nเสาร์, อาทิตย์ เหมาจ่าย 24 ชั่วโมง 50 บาท</span>\r\n\r\n<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2217" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Car-Park-PP-1140x420.jpg" alt="Car Park PP" width="1140" height="420" />\r\n\r\n<strong>Please refer to the map below for a location overview.</strong>\r\n\r\n<img class="alignnone wp-image-2796" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Asia-Centre-Map.jpg" alt="Asia Centre Map" width="642" height="586" />\r\n\r\n[wpgmza id="1"]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Location', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2064-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-10 03:01:24', '2016-08-10 03:01:24', '', 2064, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2064-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2800, 6, '2016-12-22 10:56:55', '2016-12-22 10:56:55', '<h6 class="title-median">Asia Centre (Bangkok):</h6>\n<p class="p1"><span class="s1">128/183 Phayathai Plaza Building (17th Floor),</span><span class="s1">\nPhayathai Road,\nThung-Phayathai,\nRachatewi,\nBangkok 10400 </span>Thailand</p>\n\n<div><strong>เอเชีย เซ็นเตอร์ (กรุงเทพ):</strong></div>\n<div>128/183 อาคารพญาไท พลาซ่า, ชั้น 17,</div>\n<div>ถนนพญาไท, ทุ่งพญาไท, ราชเทวี,</div>\n<div>กรุงเทพ, 10400 ประเทศไทย</div>\n&nbsp;\n\n<strong>Tel:</strong> (66) 02-1293773\n\n<strong>Fax:</strong> (66) 02-1293774\n<strong>\nEmail:</strong> <a href="mailto:info@asiacentre.co.th">info@asiacentre.co.th</a>\n\n<strong>Social:</strong> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.co.th" target="_blank">Facebook</a>\n\n<strong>How to get here:</strong> <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/contact-us/location/">See Location Details</a>\n<h6 class="title-median"></h6>\n&nbsp;', 'Contact Details', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '328-autosave-v1', '', '', '2016-12-22 10:56:55', '2016-12-22 10:56:55', '', 328, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/328-autosave-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2803, 6, '2016-08-10 10:05:41', '2016-08-10 10:05:41', '', 'Asia Centre Cover Photo-1', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'asia-centre-cover-photo-1', '', '', '2016-10-10 07:45:41', '2016-10-10 07:45:41', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Asia-Centre-Cover-Photo-1.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2808, 6, '2016-08-10 10:23:17', '2016-08-10 10:23:17', '', 'Asiacentre Cover photo', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'asiacentre-cover-photo', '', '', '2016-08-10 10:23:17', '2016-08-10 10:23:17', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Asiacentre-Cover-photo.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2810, 6, '2016-08-10 10:32:30', '2016-08-10 10:32:30', '', 'Brixit', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'brixit', '', '', '2016-08-10 10:32:30', '2016-08-10 10:32:30', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Brixit.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2815, 6, '2016-08-10 11:19:09', '2016-08-10 11:19:09', '', '1st Anniversary', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '1st-anniversary', '', '', '2016-08-10 11:19:09', '2016-08-10 11:19:09', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1st-Anniversary.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2817, 6, '2016-08-10 11:37:46', '2016-08-10 11:37:46', '', '1st Anniversary-2', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '1st-anniversary-2', '', '', '2016-08-10 11:37:46', '2016-08-10 11:37:46', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1st-Anniversary-2.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2818, 6, '2016-08-10 11:40:18', '2016-08-10 11:40:18', '', '1st Anniversary-3', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '1st-anniversary-3', '', '', '2016-08-10 11:40:18', '2016-08-10 11:40:18', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1st-Anniversary-3.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2819, 6, '2016-08-10 11:54:31', '2016-08-10 11:54:31', '', 'UPR-in-Southeast-Asia-Conference-Call-Final-Deadline-1140x1614', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'upr-in-southeast-asia-conference-call-final-deadline-1140x1614', '', '', '2016-08-10 11:54:31', '2016-08-10 11:54:31', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/UPR-in-Southeast-Asia-Conference-Call-Final-Deadline-1140x1614.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2820, 6, '2016-08-10 12:14:35', '2016-08-10 12:14:35', '', 'Media Communications workshop', '??????????', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'media-communications-workshop-2', '', '', '2016-08-10 12:14:35', '2016-08-10 12:14:35', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Media-Communications-workshop.jpeg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2822, 6, '2016-09-30 08:44:19', '2016-09-30 08:44:19', '<b>Open Call – Conference &amp; Workshop</b>\r\n<p class="c4"><span class="c0">Increasingly universities and institutions around the world are recognising the value of<img class="alignright wp-image-2610" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/OAUB-2010.jpg" alt="OAUB 2010" width="366" height="238" /> a holistic arts education that integrates a dynamic process of social engagement, public participation with others and the community. In Asia this movement of socially engaged, public participative and community art is gaining traction, albeit with different agendas at play with some universities initiating courses, the Art &amp; Society Research Centre in Tokyo (</span><span class="c19 c12"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=http://searesearchlab.org/&amp;sa=D&amp;ust=1473050593568000&amp;usg=AFQjCNFOOHHCDB_ExaKw55C-eT1D0zslmg">http://searesearchlab.org/</a></span><span class="c0">) initiating a lab on Socially Engaged/Community Art, and the National Arts Council of Singapore creating a department for Community and the Arts. We are also seeing more cross-disciplinary research and collaboration between artists, health workers, theatre groups, NGOs and the academia on art and cultural projects.</span></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><span class="c0">Enhanced engagement and cross-sectoral collaborations are designed to stir civic consciousness and foster open social structures (even as possible instrumentalisation of art and domesticating activities take place) through public participation and engagement. Key to the effective achievement of such aims is the sharing of knowledge and experiences and the building of networks, and of a knowledge and experience archive or memory pool to continually build onto and draw learning from. This conference aims to convene these knowledge by bringing together practitioners from across ASEAN to share their experiences of cross sectoral collaboration and of using participative art as open and reciprocal processes for community engagement. This pooling of knowledge can foster the development of regional frameworks for community engagement that will be beneficial to arts and community knowledge creation, and to cross sector collaboration between the arts and other sectors such as health, education and advocacy in the region. Another important aspect of such activities would be on the issue of sustainability to be explored under the rubric of social entrepreneurship.</span></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><strong><span class="c0 c9">Objective</span></strong></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><span class="c0">ASEAN level regional conference to share dynamic knowledge and build a comprehensive learning base on cross sector research and collaboration using art as open and reciprocal processes for social and community engagement.</span></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><span class="c12 c21">This event and activities will inform a forthcoming publication in 2017.</span></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><strong><span class="c0 c9">Outcomes</span></strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol class="c14 lst-kix_cwlakjkge8vw-0 start" start="1">\r\n 	<li class="c1"><span class="c0">Participants will improve their capability to articulate, negotiate and critique </span>frameworks and processes for public engaging activities and policies.</li>\r\n 	<li class="c1"><span class="c0">Participants will acquire additional knowledge and competence to engage </span>across cultures, disciplines and sectors, including acceptance of knowledge from the vernacular and the everyday.</li>\r\n 	<li class="c1"><span class="c0">Networks for sustainable collaborations will be constructed and strengthened </span>through sharing ownership of knowledge and experience.</li>\r\n 	<li class="c1"><span class="c0">Social enterprises knowledge and fund-raising initiatives can be examined and explore to realise regional collaborations.</span></li>\r\n 	<li class="c1"><span class="c0">ASEAN level research capability can be expanded to develop cross-sectors projects and know-how in the professional fields of social cross sector enterprises, such as in Arts &amp; Health, Arts in Prison, Arts in Education, etc.</span></li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p class="c4"><span class="c0"> </span></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><strong><span class="c0 c9">Participation</span></strong></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><span class="c0">This conference aims to facilitate cross sector collaboration and thus is open to participants from various fields including arts, social enterprises and cultural groups, NGOs, theatre groups, students and artists. Speakers will present their particular experiences in engaging the public, in building a constructive praxis and cross sector collaboration using art in their home country. They will share the frameworks and methodologies used as well as the challenges they have faced in executing their respective projects.</span></p>\r\n<p class="c4"><strong>\r\nParticipation size: </strong>40 pax</p>\r\n<strong>Available places: </strong>20 pax, limited scholarships are available for participants from Southeast Asia, please apply by 15 September 2016.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n----------------------------<strong>UPDATES</strong>--------------------------\r\n\r\nHere is the latest information on:\r\n\r\n<a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=171812916596976&amp;id=100013048050810" target="_blank">List of Participants</a>\r\n\r\n<a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=171812359930365&amp;id=100013048050810" target="_blank">Abstracts &amp; Bios</a>\r\n\r\n<a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=171812499930351&amp;id=100013048050810" target="_blank">Panel Presentations &amp; Programme</a>\r\n\r\n----------------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\n<strong>Conference fees</strong>\r\n\r\n<em><strong>For Participants</strong></em>\r\n\r\nEarly bird – 100 USD till 15 July       Normal – 150 USD\r\n<p class="wsite-content-title"><em><strong>For Discussants </strong>  </em></p>\r\n<p class="wsite-content-title">You can also attend the conference as a discussant to listen to the research being presented, participate in the discussions and engage with the participants/presenters. There is a conference package of USD$150 which will give you access to all four days of the conference. We are also offering a daily rate of USD$40 for those you would like to attend individual days.</p>\r\n<p class="wsite-content-title">Conference fees can be payed in two ways:</p>\r\n\r\n<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post" target="paypal"><input name="cmd" type="hidden" value="_s-xclick" />\r\n<input name="hosted_button_id" type="hidden" value="HRU9HKUVPPJLA" />\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><input name="on0" type="hidden" value="Conference Fee (For Participants)" /><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Conference Fee (For Participants)</strong></span></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><select name="os0">\r\n<option value="Early Bird">Early Bird $100.00 USD</option>\r\n<option value="Regular">Regular $150.00 USD</option>\r\n</select></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<input name="currency_code" type="hidden" value="USD" /><input alt="PayPal – The safer, easier way to pay online!" name="submit" src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_GB/TH/i/btn/btn_cart_LG.gif" type="image" />\r\n<img src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/th_TH/i/scr/pixel.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" />\r\n\r\n</form><form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post" target="paypal"><input name="cmd" type="hidden" value="_s-xclick" />\r\n<input name="hosted_button_id" type="hidden" value="H2KTCQYMYH4BC" />\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><input name="on0" type="hidden" value="Conference Fee (For Discussants)" /><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Conference Fee (For Discussants)</strong></span></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><select name="os0">\r\n<option value="Daily Rate">Daily Rate $40.00 USD</option>\r\n<option value="Conference Package">Conference Package $150.00 USD</option>\r\n</select></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<input alt="PayPal – The safer, easier way to pay online!" name="submit" src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_GB/TH/i/btn/btn_cart_LG.gif" type="image" />\r\n<img src="https://www.paypalobjects.com/th_TH/i/scr/pixel.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" />\r\n\r\n</form><img class=" wp-image-2651 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/performance_payments.png" alt="performance_payments" width="197" height="68" />\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n*Please be aware that the conference fee is non-refundable.\r\n**All costs regarding the transfer of the conference fee (Transfer fees) are to be covered by the applicant.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>How to respond to this Open Call:</strong>\r\n\r\nParticipants who wish to attend should send a short biography of not over 350 words on registration or as early as possible to ifima7[at] gmail.com and choose one of the following roles of participation.\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>As Discussant – “To live means to participate in dialogue: to ask questions…”.</li>\r\n 	<li>As Presenter – Please provide a text and context of your presentation, with a description of processes and methodology, not exceeding 900 words. During the conference, your presentation will be limited to 15 mins. You should include discussion of a case study or project, focusing on context, intention, processes or methodology and the learning achieved.</li>\r\n 	<li>As Respondent - You will be consulted and be assigned to a panel. During the conference, you will respond to one or more of the presentations.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Convenor:</strong> Dr Jay Koh, artist-curator &amp; researcher, director of iFIMA (international Forum for InterMedia Art, author of <a href="http://www.ifima.net/ALPPpreviewsm.pdf" target="_blank">Art-Led Participative Processes</a>.\r\n\r\n<strong>Regional partner:</strong> <a href="http://www.brack.sg/" target="_blank">BRACK, Singapore</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>Venue:</strong> <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th" target="_blank">Asia Centre, Bangkok</a>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nNote: The convenor and organisers reserve the right to decide on the final selection and designation of participants.', 'Working with People-Centred Processes: Art, Education & Cross-Sector Collaboration', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2609-autosave-v1', '', '', '2016-09-30 08:44:19', '2016-09-30 08:44:19', '', 2609, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2609-autosave-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2824, 5, '2016-08-25 07:05:46', '2016-08-25 07:05:46', '', 'Draft Programme', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'draft-programme', '', '', '2016-08-25 07:05:46', '2016-08-25 07:05:46', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Draft-Programme.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2825, 5, '2016-08-25 07:05:48', '2016-08-25 07:05:48', '', 'Draft Programme Day 2', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'draft-programme-day-2', '', '', '2016-08-25 07:05:48', '2016-08-25 07:05:48', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Draft-Programme-Day-2.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2826, 5, '2016-08-25 07:05:50', '2016-08-25 07:05:50', '', 'Draft Programme Day 3', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'draft-programme-day-3', '', '', '2016-08-25 07:05:50', '2016-08-25 07:05:50', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Draft-Programme-Day-3.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2828, 5, '2016-08-25 09:20:30', '2016-08-25 09:20:30', '<img class=" wp-image-2832 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-25-at-16.26.28.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 16.26.28" width="342" height="228" /><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a mechanism under the Human Rights Council that reviews the human rights situation in all 193 UN Member States once every four and a half years. All ASEAN states have undergone two review cycles of their respective human rights situations under the process. But how effective has the process been in improving the regional human rights situation.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis panel discussion will focus on the effectiveness of the UPR in strengthening human rights in the region. It will delve into how effective the UPR has been in unearthing and highlighting key human rights issues, how we can improve process of implementing UPR recommendations and follow up processes to ensure key issues remain on the agenda in the 3rd cycle. It will consider the role that civil society organisations, national human rights institutions and the ASEAN human rights mechanisms play in monitoring implementation, highlighting issues  and pushing for change.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis panel discussion comes at the end of Asia Centre’s two day conference; Universal Periodic Review: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment. Academics, researchers and students who are researching human rights in the region are encouraged to attend. For more information on the conference please click <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/event/universal-periodic-review-in-southeast-asia/" target="_blank">here</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nTickets: 200Baht<span style="font-weight: 400;">\r\n<img class="size-full wp-image-2831 aligncenter" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-25-at-16.16.40.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 16.16.40" width="580" height="228" /><span style="font-weight: 400;">Do email proof of payment (receipt of transfer) along with the names and email addresses of all attendees to </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="mailto:contact@asiacentre.co.th">contact@asiacentre.co.th</a>. </span></span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Please note tickets are not refundable. We will send you an email confirmation with your ticket once we receive proof of payment.</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">If you have any queries give us a call at 02 129 3773 or email us at </span><a href="mailto:contact@asiacentre.co.th"><span style="font-weight: 400;">contact@asiacentre.co.th</span></a>', 'Southeast Asia & The UPR: All Talk & No Action?', '', 'publish', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'southeast-asia-the-upr-all-talk-no-action', '', '', '2016-12-22 06:47:35', '2016-12-22 06:47:35', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/?post_type=event&#038;p=2828', 0, 'event', '', 0),
(2829, 5, '2016-08-25 09:09:38', '2016-08-25 09:09:38', '', 'Talking', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'talking', '', '', '2016-08-25 09:09:38', '2016-08-25 09:09:38', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Talking.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2831, 5, '2016-08-25 09:17:11', '2016-08-25 09:17:11', '', 'Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 16.16.40', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'screen-shot-2016-08-25-at-16-16-40', '', '', '2016-08-25 09:17:11', '2016-08-25 09:17:11', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-25-at-16.16.40.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2832, 5, '2016-08-25 09:32:14', '2016-08-25 09:32:14', '', 'Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 16.26.28', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'screen-shot-2016-08-25-at-16-26-28', '', '', '2016-08-25 09:32:14', '2016-08-25 09:32:14', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-25-at-16.26.28.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2833, 5, '2016-08-25 09:32:33', '2016-08-25 09:32:33', '<img class=" wp-image-2832 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-25-at-16.26.28.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 16.26.28" width="342" height="228" /><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a mechanism under the Human Rights Council that reviews the human rights situation in all 193 UN Member States once every four and a half years. All ASEAN states have undergone two review cycles of their respective human rights situations under the process. But how effective has the process been in improving the regional human rights situation.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis panel discussion will focus on the effectiveness of the UPR in strengthening human rights in the region. It will delve into how effective the UPR has been in unearthing and highlighting key human rights issues, how we can improve process of implementing UPR recommendations and follow up processes to ensure key issues remain on the agenda in the 3rd cycle. It will consider the role that civil society organisations, national human rights institutions and the ASEAN human rights mechanisms play in monitoring implementation, highlighting issues  and pushing for change.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis panel discussion comes at the end of Asia Centre’s two day conference; Universal Periodic Review: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment. Academics, researchers and students who are researching human rights in the region are encouraged to attend. For more information on the conference please click <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/event/universal-periodic-review-in-southeast-asia/" target="_blank">here</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nTickets: 200Baht<span style="font-weight: 400;">\r\n<img class="size-full wp-image-2831 aligncenter" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-Shot-2016-08-25-at-16.16.40.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 16.16.40" width="580" height="228" /><span style="font-weight: 400;">Do email proof of payment (receipt of transfer) along with the names and email addresses of all attendees to </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="mailto:contact@asiacentre.co.th">contact@asiacentre.co.th</a>. </span></span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Please note tickets are not refundable. We will send you an email confirmation with your ticket once we receive proof of payment.</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">If you have any queries give us a call at 02 129 3773 or email us at </span><a href="mailto:contact@asiacentre.co.th"><span style="font-weight: 400;">contact@asiacentre.co.th</span></a>', 'Southeast Asia & The UPR: All Talk & No Action?', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2828-autosave-v1', '', '', '2016-08-25 09:32:33', '2016-08-25 09:32:33', '', 2828, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2828-autosave-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2834, 6, '2016-08-26 04:17:00', '2016-08-26 04:17:00', '', 'UPR-in-Southeast-Asia-Conference-Call-Final-Deadline-1140x1614-e1470830119722', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'upr-in-southeast-asia-conference-call-final-deadline-1140x1614-e1470830119722', '', '', '2016-08-26 04:17:00', '2016-08-26 04:17:00', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/UPR-in-Southeast-Asia-Conference-Call-Final-Deadline-1140x1614-e1470830119722-1.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2836, 6, '2016-08-26 04:19:54', '2016-08-26 04:19:54', '', 'Brixit', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'brixit-2', '', '', '2016-08-26 04:19:54', '2016-08-26 04:19:54', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Brixit-1.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2840, 6, '2016-08-26 04:25:42', '2016-08-26 04:25:42', '', 'OAUB-2010', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'oaub-2010-2', '', '', '2016-10-10 07:41:32', '2016-10-10 07:41:32', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/OAUB-2010.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2842, 5, '2016-08-26 04:42:09', '2016-08-26 04:42:09', '<a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/intern2.jpg">\r\n</a><a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/intern2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2036 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/intern2.jpg" alt="intern2" width="190" height="190" /></a> The Centre provides training opportunities to interns to undertake substantive and practical work in two professional streams: a research stream and a communications stream.\r\n\r\n<strong>Research Intern</strong>\r\n\r\nThe Research Intern will undertake research and draft project notes and proposals. These duties will include the development of training materials and preparation of programme schedules. The Intern will also compile information for book manuscripts, commentaries and journal articles. Other responsibilities include coordinating meetings and seminars.\r\n\r\n<strong>Communications Intern</strong>\r\n\r\nThe Communications Intern will assist with writing content, taking photos, creating videos, uploading information onto the website, posting on social media sites of the Centre, maintaining an active mailing list and compiling and disseminating an e-newsletter. The intern will also assist in laying out brochures, flyers, posters and assist with digital marketing and <a href="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/intern.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2035 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/intern.jpg" alt="intern" width="260" height="182" /></a>outreach.\r\n\r\n<strong>Eligibility</strong>\r\n\r\nInternships are offered to Thai citizens and foreign students currently enrolled in tertiary institutions in Thailand and abroad.\r\n\r\n<strong>Duration </strong>\r\n\r\nThe Centre recruits interns for a period of 3 to 6 months. Longer internships can be considered on a case by case basis.\r\n\r\n<strong>General Conditions</strong>\r\n\r\nThe internship is non-remunerated. Interns are expected to work between 24 to 40 hours per week.\r\n\r\n<strong>Application procedure:</strong>\r\n\r\nInterested students should submit, in one pdf document, the following information to: <a href="mailto:info@asiacentre.co.th">info@asiacentre.co.th</a>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Official letter of university enrolment</li>\r\n 	<li>Copy of passport</li>\r\n 	<li>CV</li>\r\n 	<li>Cover letter stating their skills, interests and availability (i.e. 3 or 6 months)</li>\r\n</ul>', 'Internship Programme', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2032-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-08-26 04:42:09', '2016-08-26 04:42:09', '', 2032, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2032-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2844, 5, '2016-09-05 10:39:48', '2016-09-05 10:39:48', '<strong>Silvia Waldbach</strong>\r\n\r\n<img class="size-full wp-image-2845 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Screen-Shot-2016-09-05-at-17.28.20.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-09-05 at 17.28.20" width="190" height="271" />Silvia Waldbach is doing a research internship at Asia Centre from September to December 2016. The focus of her research is on national human rights institutions in Southeast Asia and their engagement with the Universal Periodic Review process. She is in the last year of a bachelors degree in International Cultural and Business Studies with focus on Southeast Asia, at the University of Passau, Germany.\r\n\r\nShe decided to do an internship at Asia Centre because she wants to deepen her knowledge of contemporary Southeast Asian issues and improve her research, writing and organizing skills. She also enjoys working in an international work environment with various kinds of stakeholders from international and local civil society, to academia and the private sector. In her free time, Silvia likes spending time in nature, going to concerts, travelling and cooking.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Anna Jeffries</strong>\r\n\r\nAnna Jeffries is here at Asia Centre from July through September 2<img class="alignright wp-image-2701" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Bio-Picture-1-1140x641.jpg" alt="Bio Picture" width="298" height="168" />016 for a research internship\r\non human rights.  Her focus is the role and impact of Southeast Asian civil society and the Universal Periodic Review.  Anna is completing her degree in Global Studies: Global Security at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She is also pursuing studies in Japanese and Korean.  She chose her internship with Asia Centre to allow her to gain a wide range of skills including event management, budgeting, fundraising, research, and leadership skills. When not researching and studying Anna enjoys trying new foods, reading a good book, and watching movies.\r\n\r\nAnna was connected with Asia Centre by our partner organisation, <a href="http://aipglobal.co" target="_blank">AIPGlobal</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Interns', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2686-autosave-v1', '', '', '2016-09-05 10:39:48', '2016-09-05 10:39:48', '', 2686, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2686-autosave-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2845, 5, '2016-09-05 10:28:27', '2016-09-05 10:28:27', '', 'Screen Shot 2016-09-05 at 17.28.20', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'screen-shot-2016-09-05-at-17-28-20', '', '', '2016-11-29 04:01:27', '2016-11-29 04:01:27', '', 2686, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Screen-Shot-2016-09-05-at-17.28.20.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2846, 5, '2016-09-05 10:30:36', '2016-09-05 10:30:36', '<strong>Anna Jeffries</strong>\r\n\r\nAnna Jeffries is here at Asia Centre from July through September 2<img class="alignright wp-image-2701" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Bio-Picture-1-1140x641.jpg" alt="Bio Picture" width="298" height="168" />016 for a research internship\r\non human rights.  Her focus is the role and impact of Southeast Asian civil society and the Universal Periodic Review.  Anna is completing her degree in Global Studies: Global Security at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She is also pursuing studies in Japanese and Korean.  She chose her internship with Asia Centre to allow her to gain a wide range of skills including event management, budgeting, fundraising, research, and leadership skills. When not researching and studying Anna enjoys trying new foods, reading a good book, and watching movies.\r\n\r\nAnna was connected with Asia Centre by our partner organisation, <a href="http://aipglobal.co" target="_blank">AIPGlobal</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Silvia Waldbach</strong>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="size-full wp-image-2845 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Screen-Shot-2016-09-05-at-17.28.20.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-09-05 at 17.28.20" width="190" height="271" />Silvia Waldbach is doing a research internship at Asia Centre from September to December 2016. The focus of her research is on national human rights institutions in Southeast Asia and their engagement with the Universal Periodic Review process. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">She is in the last year of a bachelors degree in International Cultural and Business Studies with focus on Southeast Asia, at the University of Passau, Germany.</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">She decided to do an internship at Asia Centre because she wants to deepen her knowledge of contemporary Southeast Asian issues and improve her research, writing and organizing skills. She also enjoys working in an international work environment with various kinds of stakeholders from international and local civil society, to academia and the private sector. In her free time, Silvia likes spending time in nature, going to concerts, travelling and cooking.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Interns', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2686-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-05 10:30:36', '2016-09-05 10:30:36', '', 2686, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2686-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2847, 5, '2016-09-05 10:39:57', '2016-09-05 10:39:57', '<strong>Silvia Waldbach</strong>\r\n\r\n<img class="size-full wp-image-2845 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Screen-Shot-2016-09-05-at-17.28.20.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-09-05 at 17.28.20" width="190" height="271" />Silvia Waldbach is doing a research internship at Asia Centre from September to December 2016. The focus of her research is on national human rights institutions in Southeast Asia and their engagement with the Universal Periodic Review process. She is in the last year of a bachelors degree in International Cultural and Business Studies with focus on Southeast Asia, at the University of Passau, Germany.\r\n\r\nShe decided to do an internship at Asia Centre because she wants to deepen her knowledge of contemporary Southeast Asian issues and improve her research, writing and organizing skills. She also enjoys working in an international work environment with various kinds of stakeholders from international and local civil society, to academia and the private sector. In her free time, Silvia likes spending time in nature, going to concerts, travelling and cooking.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Anna Jeffries</strong>\r\n\r\nAnna Jeffries is here at Asia Centre from July through September 2<img class="alignright wp-image-2701" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Bio-Picture-1-1140x641.jpg" alt="Bio Picture" width="298" height="168" />016 for a research internship\r\non human rights.  Her focus is the role and impact of Southeast Asian civil society and the Universal Periodic Review.  Anna is completing her degree in Global Studies: Global Security at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She is also pursuing studies in Japanese and Korean.  She chose her internship with Asia Centre to allow her to gain a wide range of skills including event management, budgeting, fundraising, research, and leadership skills. When not researching and studying Anna enjoys trying new foods, reading a good book, and watching movies.\r\n\r\nAnna was connected with Asia Centre by our partner organisation, <a href="http://aipglobal.co" target="_blank">AIPGlobal</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Interns', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2686-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-05 10:39:57', '2016-09-05 10:39:57', '', 2686, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2686-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2848, 5, '2016-09-05 10:49:18', '2016-09-05 10:49:18', '<strong>Silvia Waldbach</strong>\r\n\r\n<img class="size-full wp-image-2845 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Screen-Shot-2016-09-05-at-17.28.20.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-09-05 at 17.28.20" width="190" height="271" />Silvia Waldbach is doing a research internship at Asia Centre from September to December 2016. The focus of her research is on national human rights institutions in Southeast Asia and their engagement with the Universal Periodic Review process. She is in the last year of a bachelors degree in International Cultural and Business Studies, with focus on Southeast Asia, at the University of Passau, Germany.\r\n\r\nShe decided to do an internship at Asia Centre because she wants to deepen her knowledge of contemporary Southeast Asian issues and improve her research, writing and organizing skills. She also enjoys working in an international work environment with various kinds of stakeholders from international and local civil society, to academia and the private sector. In her free time, Silvia likes spending time in nature, going to concerts, travelling and cooking.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Anna Jeffries</strong>\r\n\r\nAnna Jeffries is here at Asia Centre from July through September 2<img class="alignright wp-image-2701" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Bio-Picture-1-1140x641.jpg" alt="Bio Picture" width="298" height="168" />016 for a research internship\r\non human rights.  Her focus is the role and impact of Southeast Asian civil society and the Universal Periodic Review.  Anna is completing her degree in Global Studies: Global Security at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She is also pursuing studies in Japanese and Korean.  She chose her internship with Asia Centre to allow her to gain a wide range of skills including event management, budgeting, fundraising, research, and leadership skills. When not researching and studying Anna enjoys trying new foods, reading a good book, and watching movies.\r\n\r\nAnna was connected with Asia Centre by our partner organisation, <a href="http://aipglobal.co" target="_blank">AIPGlobal</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Interns', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2686-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-05 10:49:18', '2016-09-05 10:49:18', '', 2686, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2686-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2850, 6, '2016-09-06 03:14:46', '2016-09-06 03:14:46', '', 'Internship', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'internship-2', '', '', '2016-09-06 03:14:46', '2016-09-06 03:14:46', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Internship.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2854, 6, '2016-09-16 07:05:58', '2016-09-16 07:05:58', '', 'Internship-1', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'internship-1', '', '', '2016-12-27 03:12:34', '2016-12-27 03:12:34', '', 2032, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Internship-1.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2855, 6, '2016-09-16 07:19:03', '2016-09-16 07:19:03', 'Asia Centre offers meeting services at its boutique and cosy facilities conveniently located in the heart of Bangkok, 20 metres away from Phayathai BTS and Airport Link. Our spaces are perfect for private meetings, conferences, training workshops, networking sessions and other boutique events such as book launches, readings, screenings, etc.\r\n\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n\r\n<strong>We can host up to 40 (seating) and 60 (seating and standing). The following are available:</strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Flexible room layouts (networking, theatre, classroom, round table, boardroom)</li>\r\n 	<li>High-speed internet access, Skype video-conferencing, computers</li>\r\n 	<li>AV Equipment: flat-screen TV, projector, screen, wireless microphones, etc.</li>\r\n 	<li>Private lockers and lounge area</li>\r\n 	<li>Pantry with microwave, kettle, hot/cold water dispenser and fridge</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nOur services are competitively priced and low cost catering can be arranged through advanced booking. Additional on-demand meeting services include printing, photocopying and secretarial support.\r\n\r\n<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8CIMc6y7oxkR3FJQ3diOXZQRlU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Click here to Download brochure</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>For more information in Thai please visit our Thai Facebook page</strong>\r\n\r\n<a href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.rental">https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.rental</a>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[button style="btn-info" size="btn-md" label="Book Now" link="#bookingform" link_opens="_self"]\r\n\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n\r\n<strong>WEEKDAY RATES</strong>\r\n<table class="table table-striped" style="height: 292px;" width="746">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Room Type</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><strong>1 hour</strong></td>\r\n<td width="84"><strong>Half day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="78"><strong>Full day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"><strong>Evening</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong> </strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><em>Min.3 hrs\r\n</em><em>(8-5pm) </em></td>\r\n<td width="84">08.00-12.00\r\nor 13.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="78">08.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="73">17.00-21.00</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Seminar Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">1,400</td>\r\n<td width="84">4,000</td>\r\n<td width="78">7,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">6,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Discussion room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">750</td>\r\n<td width="84">1,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">2,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Both Rooms</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">1,500</td>\r\n<td width="84">4,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">7,000</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong>WEEKEND AND PUBLIC HOLIDAY RATES </strong>\r\n<table class="table table-striped" width="441">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Room Type</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><strong>1 hour</strong></td>\r\n<td width="84"><strong>Half day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="78"><strong>Full day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"><strong>Evening</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong> </strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><em>Min.3 hrs\r\n</em><em>(8-5pm)</em></td>\r\n<td width="84">08.00-12.00\r\nor 13.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="78">08.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="73">17.00-21.00</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Seminar Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">2,400</td>\r\n<td width="84">7,000</td>\r\n<td width="78">14,000</td>\r\n<td width="73">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Discussion Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">NA</td>\r\n<td width="84">NA</td>\r\n<td width="78">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Both Rooms</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">2,800</td>\r\n<td width="84">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">16,000</td>\r\n<td width="73">10,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<h3><strong>Room Capacity</strong></h3>\r\n<table class="table table-striped">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style="text-align: left;" width="76"><strong>Layout</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="75"><strong>Theatre</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="79"><strong>Classroom*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81"><strong>Round Table*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81"><strong>Boardroom*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="59"><strong>Discussion Room</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="76"><strong>Number </strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="75">40</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="79">30</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81">24</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81">15</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="59">4</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n* Additional chairs available on request\r\n<h3><strong>Office Suite</strong></h3>\r\nWe also have an office suite that accommodates two working stations, which can be equipped as required.\r\n<table class="table table-striped">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Office Suite</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50"><strong>Weekly</strong></td>\r\n<td width="54"><strong>Monthly</strong></td>\r\n<td width="44"><strong>Yearly</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Full Unit (3 desks)</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50">10,000</td>\r\n<td width="54">30,000</td>\r\n<td width="44">25,000</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Sharing (1 desk)</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50">3,000</td>\r\n<td width="54">10,000</td>\r\n<td width="44">8,000</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"></td>\r\n<td width="50"></td>\r\n<td width="54"></td>\r\n<td width="44"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong>REMARKS: </strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>All Rate in Thai Baht. Rates are subjected to 7% VAT. Rate are subjected to change without prior notice.</li>\r\n 	<li>Full advance payment to confirm booking.</li>\r\n 	<li>Seminar Room Service: Price included use of Projector, Sound system, Wi-Fi internet, Hot/ Cold water dispenser.</li>\r\n 	<li>Catering started from 80 Baht/Person (3 in 1 Coffee + drinking water + 1 Snack, additional snack 30 Baht/pc.) 7 days advanced booking and minimum order 30 pax.</li>\r\n 	<li>A 500 Baht cleaning fee will be charged to self-catering events.</li>\r\n 	<li>Events that exceed the booking time by more than 15 minutes will be charged an additional full hour rate.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<a name="bookingform"></a>\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n<h1><strong>Space Booking Form</strong></h1>\r\n[formidable id=3]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Spaces', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '1918-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-16 07:19:03', '2016-09-16 07:19:03', '', 1918, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/1918-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2856, 6, '2016-09-16 07:20:30', '2016-09-16 07:20:30', 'Asia Centre offers meeting services at its boutique and cosy facilities conveniently located in the heart of Bangkok, 20 metres away from Phayathai BTS and Airport Link. Our spaces are perfect for private meetings, conferences, training workshops, networking sessions and other boutique events such as book launches, readings, screenings, etc.\r\n\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n\r\n<strong>We can host up to 40 (seating) and 60 (seating and standing). The following are available:</strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Flexible room layouts (networking, theatre, classroom, round table, boardroom)</li>\r\n 	<li>High-speed internet access, Skype video-conferencing, computers</li>\r\n 	<li>AV Equipment: flat-screen TV, projector, screen, wireless microphones, etc.</li>\r\n 	<li>Private lockers and lounge area</li>\r\n 	<li>Pantry with microwave, kettle, hot/cold water dispenser and fridge</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nOur services are competitively priced and low cost catering can be arranged through advanced booking. Additional on-demand meeting services include printing, photocopying and secretarial support.\r\n\r\n<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8CIMc6y7oxkR3FJQ3diOXZQRlU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Click here to Download brochure</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>For more information in Thai please visit our Thai Facebook page</strong>\r\n\r\n<a href="https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.rental" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/asiacentre.rental</a>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[button style="btn-info" size="btn-md" label="Book Now" link="#bookingform" link_opens="_self"]\r\n\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n\r\n<strong>WEEKDAY RATES</strong>\r\n<table class="table table-striped" style="height: 292px;" width="746">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Room Type</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><strong>1 hour</strong></td>\r\n<td width="84"><strong>Half day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="78"><strong>Full day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"><strong>Evening</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong> </strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><em>Min.3 hrs\r\n</em><em>(8-5pm) </em></td>\r\n<td width="84">08.00-12.00\r\nor 13.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="78">08.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="73">17.00-21.00</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Seminar Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">1,400</td>\r\n<td width="84">4,000</td>\r\n<td width="78">7,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">6,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Discussion room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">750</td>\r\n<td width="84">1,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">2,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Both Rooms</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">1,500</td>\r\n<td width="84">4,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="73">7,000</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong>WEEKEND AND PUBLIC HOLIDAY RATES </strong>\r\n<table class="table table-striped" width="441">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Room Type</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><strong>1 hour</strong></td>\r\n<td width="84"><strong>Half day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="78"><strong>Full day</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"><strong>Evening</strong></td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong> </strong></td>\r\n<td width="51"><em>Min.3 hrs\r\n</em><em>(8-5pm)</em></td>\r\n<td width="84">08.00-12.00\r\nor 13.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="78">08.00-17.00</td>\r\n<td width="73">17.00-21.00</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Seminar Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">2,400</td>\r\n<td width="84">7,000</td>\r\n<td width="78">14,000</td>\r\n<td width="73">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Discussion Room</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">NA</td>\r\n<td width="84">NA</td>\r\n<td width="78">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73">NA</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="83"><strong>Both Rooms</strong></td>\r\n<td width="51">2,800</td>\r\n<td width="84">8,500</td>\r\n<td width="78">16,000</td>\r\n<td width="73">10,500</td>\r\n<td width="73"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<h3><strong>Room Capacity</strong></h3>\r\n<table class="table table-striped">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style="text-align: left;" width="76"><strong>Layout</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="75"><strong>Theatre</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="79"><strong>Classroom*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81"><strong>Round Table*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81"><strong>Boardroom*</strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="59"><strong>Discussion Room</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="76"><strong>Number </strong></td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="75">40</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="79">30</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81">24</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="81">15</td>\r\n<td style="text-align: center;" width="59">4</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n* Additional chairs available on request\r\n<h3><strong>Office Suite</strong></h3>\r\nWe also have an office suite that accommodates two working stations, which can be equipped as required.\r\n<table class="table table-striped">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Office Suite</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50"><strong>Weekly</strong></td>\r\n<td width="54"><strong>Monthly</strong></td>\r\n<td width="44"><strong>Yearly</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Full Unit (3 desks)</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50">10,000</td>\r\n<td width="54">30,000</td>\r\n<td width="44">25,000</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"><strong>Sharing (1 desk)</strong></td>\r\n<td width="50">3,000</td>\r\n<td width="54">10,000</td>\r\n<td width="44">8,000</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width="116"></td>\r\n<td width="50"></td>\r\n<td width="54"></td>\r\n<td width="44"></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong>REMARKS: </strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>All Rate in Thai Baht. Rates are subjected to 7% VAT. Rate are subjected to change without prior notice.</li>\r\n 	<li>Full advance payment to confirm booking.</li>\r\n 	<li>Seminar Room Service: Price included use of Projector, Sound system, Wi-Fi internet, Hot/ Cold water dispenser.</li>\r\n 	<li>Catering started from 80 Baht/Person (3 in 1 Coffee + drinking water + 1 Snack, additional snack 30 Baht/pc.) 7 days advanced booking and minimum order 30 pax.</li>\r\n 	<li>A 500 Baht cleaning fee will be charged to self-catering events.</li>\r\n 	<li>Events that exceed the booking time by more than 15 minutes will be charged an additional full hour rate.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<a name="bookingform"></a>\r\n[separator style="regular"]\r\n<h1><strong>Space Booking Form</strong></h1>\r\n[formidable id=3]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'Spaces', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '1918-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-16 07:20:30', '2016-09-16 07:20:30', '', 1918, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/1918-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2859, 5, '2016-09-20 03:08:38', '2016-09-20 03:08:38', '<p style="text-align: justify;">On the eve of the 2016 US elections, will it be “change maker” Hillary Clinton or “believe me” Donald Trump?Will Hillary bring real change at last to the lives of working class Americans? Or will billionaire Trump “fix” a “rigged” political system and all the ills afflicting the USA? Has the “Bern” factor moved the Democratic Party too far to the left? Having captured the reigns of an establishment party and its core voters does outsider, property mogul Donald Trump’s nomination spell the end of the Republican Party, as Trump assaults its traditional values? How will either candidate engage with Asia and the rest of the world?</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="wp-image-2860 aligncenter" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Screen-Shot-2016-09-20-at-09.51.34.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-09-20 at 09.51.34" width="379" height="250" /></p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">This roundtable, featuring expert commentators, will examine these questions and more through short presentations and engagement with the audience.</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">Come armed with your questions, thoughts and arguments.  Join us for what will no doubt be an interesting and lively evening of discussions and networking!</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Panellists</b>:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul style="text-align: justify;">\r\n 	<li>Margaret MacMillion, Former Ambassador of the United States to Rwanda</li>\r\n 	<li>Kevin Downey, Thammasat University</li>\r\n 	<li>Jerimiah Morris, Mahidol University International College</li>\r\n 	<li>Pablo Ramirez, Bangkok University</li>\r\n 	<li>Mike Raomanachai, AAJA</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">Moderator: Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre.</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">This event is organised in partnership with <a href="http://aaja.org/chapters/asia/" target="_blank">Asian American Journalists Association (AAJA)</a>.</p>\r\n\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed" style="text-align: justify;"><em><img class=" wp-image-2862 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/AAJA_Asia_Logo-1140x769.png" alt="AAJA_Asia_Logo" width="203" height="137" /></em><strong><a href="http://aaja.org/chapters/asia" target="_blank">Asian American Journalists Association (AAJA)</a></strong></div>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"><em><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">AAJA is a U.S.-based nonprofit organization that serves Asian American and Pacific Islander journalists. Our goals include making newsrooms more ethnically and racially diverse and ensuring fair and accurate coverage of the Asian community.\r\n</span></em></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"><em>Today, the Asia chapter has about 200 members across the region. They work for a range of media, from The Associated Press, Thomson Reuters and Dow Jones to CNN, ABC, VOA and CCTV. They are a networking group for AAJA members in Asia and the Pacific and a bridge for AAJA members from the US and across the globe who come to the region or want to work here. They hold talks, workshops and socials in various cities throughout the year and offer advice and support to fellow AAJA members with an interest in Asia.</em></div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;">\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed"><span class="text_exposed_show">If you have any queries give us a call at 02 129 3773 or email us at contact@asiacentre.co.th\r\n</span></div>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed"></div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;">\r\n\r\n<img class="wp-image-3062 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/hbs-logo-separate2-600x443.jpg" alt="hbs-logo-separate2" width="172" height="127" /><strong>This event is supported by the Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Southeast Asia.</strong>\r\n\r\n</div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed"></div>', 'The 2016 US Elections: Change at Last?', '', 'publish', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'the-2016-us-elections-change-at-last', '', '', '2016-12-22 06:48:35', '2016-12-22 06:48:35', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/?post_type=event&#038;p=2859', 0, 'event', '', 0),
(2860, 5, '2016-09-20 03:07:00', '2016-09-20 03:07:00', '', 'Screen Shot 2016-09-20 at 09.51.34', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'screen-shot-2016-09-20-at-09-51-34', '', '', '2016-09-20 03:07:00', '2016-09-20 03:07:00', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Screen-Shot-2016-09-20-at-09.51.34.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2861, 5, '2016-10-18 04:56:52', '2016-10-18 04:56:52', '<p style="text-align: justify;">On the eve of the 2016 US elections, will it be “change maker” Hillary Clinton or “believe me” Donald Trump?Will Hillary bring real change at last to the lives of working class Americans? Or will billionaire Trump “fix” a “rigged” political system and all the ills afflicting the USA? Has the “Bern” factor moved the Democratic Party too far to the left? Having captured the reigns of an establishment party and its core voters does outsider, property mogul Donald Trump’s nomination spell the end of the Republican Party, as Trump assaults its traditional values? How will either candidate engage with Asia and the rest of the world?</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="wp-image-2860 aligncenter" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Screen-Shot-2016-09-20-at-09.51.34.png" alt="Screen Shot 2016-09-20 at 09.51.34" width="379" height="250" /></p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">This roundtable, featuring expert commentators, will examine these questions and more through short presentations and engagement with the audience.</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">Come armed with your questions, thoughts and arguments.  Join us for what will no doubt be an interesting and lively evening of discussions and networking!</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Panellists</b>:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul style="text-align: justify;">\r\n 	<li>Margaret MacMillion, Former Ambassador of the United States to Rwanda</li>\r\n 	<li>Kevin Downey, Thammasat University</li>\r\n 	<li>Jerimiah Morris, Mahidol University International College</li>\r\n 	<li>Pablo Ramirez, Bangkok University</li>\r\n 	<li>Mike Raomanachai, AAJA</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">Moderator: Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre.</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">This event is organised in partnership with <a href="http://aaja.org/chapters/asia/" target="_blank">Asian American Journalists Association (AAJA)</a>.</p>\r\n\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed" style="text-align: justify;"><em><img class=" wp-image-2862 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/AAJA_Asia_Logo-1140x769.png" alt="AAJA_Asia_Logo" width="203" height="137" /></em><strong><a href="http://aaja.org/chapters/asia" target="_blank">Asian American Journalists Association (AAJA)</a></strong></div>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"><em><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">AAJA is a U.S.-based nonprofit organization that serves Asian American and Pacific Islander journalists. Our goals include making newsrooms more ethnically and racially diverse and ensuring fair and accurate coverage of the Asian community.\r\n</span></em></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"><em>Today, the Asia chapter has about 200 members across the region. They work for a range of media, from The Associated Press, Thomson Reuters and Dow Jones to CNN, ABC, VOA and CCTV. They are a networking group for AAJA members in Asia and the Pacific and a bridge for AAJA members from the US and across the globe who come to the region or want to work here. They hold talks, workshops and socials in various cities throughout the year and offer advice and support to fellow AAJA members with an interest in Asia.</em></div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;">\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed"><span class="text_exposed_show">If you have any queries give us a call at 02 129 3773 or email us at contact@asiacentre.co.th\r\n</span></div>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed"></div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;">\r\n\r\n<img class="wp-image-3062 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/hbs-logo-separate2-600x443.jpg" alt="hbs-logo-separate2" width="172" height="127" /><strong>This event is supported by the Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Southeast Asia.</strong>\r\n\r\n</div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>\r\n<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed"></div>', 'The 2016 US Elections: Change at Last?', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2859-autosave-v1', '', '', '2016-10-18 04:56:52', '2016-10-18 04:56:52', '', 2859, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2859-autosave-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2862, 5, '2016-09-22 09:19:02', '2016-09-22 09:19:02', '', 'AAJA_Asia_Logo', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'aaja_asia_logo', '', '', '2016-09-22 09:19:02', '2016-09-22 09:19:02', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/AAJA_Asia_Logo.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2863, 5, '2016-09-22 09:19:31', '2016-09-22 09:19:31', '', 'Asia-Centre-Logo-Flat-Color-GA (3) (1)', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'asia-centre-logo-flat-color-ga-3-1', '', '', '2017-01-11 16:43:33', '2017-01-11 09:43:33', '', 3476, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Asia-Centre-Logo-Flat-Color-GA-3-1.png', 0, 'attachment', 'image/png', 0),
(2864, 5, '2016-09-26 04:24:50', '2016-09-26 04:24:50', '<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation of recommendations by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span></p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span></p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights mechanisms, patterns of enhanced </span>CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations.</p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;">There were al<img class="wp-image-2868 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" />so issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste.</p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights, defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the UPR dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span></p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b></p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span></p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and provided critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span></p>\r\n<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span></p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style="text-align: left;"><b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                                                                        </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia\r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                                                  </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                                                                    </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">\r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward\r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                                                  </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief\r\n</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement</b></b>\r\nFrancesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li style="text-align: left;"><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives                                  </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'publish', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'upr-conference-report', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 0, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/?p=2864', 0, 'post', '', 0),
(2865, 5, '2016-09-26 03:18:27', '2016-09-26 03:18:27', '', 'IMG_2172-001', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'img_2172-001', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001.jpg', 0, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2866, 5, '2016-09-26 03:19:18', '2016-09-26 03:19:18', '', 'IMG_2253', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'img_2253', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253.jpg', 1, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2867, 5, '2016-09-26 03:22:30', '2016-09-26 03:22:30', '', 'IMG_2200', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'img_2200', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200.jpg', 2, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2868, 5, '2016-09-26 03:23:41', '2016-09-26 03:23:41', '', 'IMG_2259-001', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'img_2259-001', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001.jpg', 3, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2869, 5, '2016-09-26 03:25:11', '2016-09-26 03:25:11', '', 'IMG_2416', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'img_2416', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416.jpg', 4, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2870, 5, '2016-09-26 03:26:32', '2016-09-26 03:26:32', '', 'IP (1)', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'ip-1', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1.jpg', 5, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2871, 5, '2016-09-26 03:27:15', '2016-09-26 03:27:15', '', 'IMG_2542-001', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', 'img_2542-001', '', '', '2017-01-17 15:38:44', '2017-01-17 08:38:44', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001.jpg', 6, 'attachment', 'image/jpeg', 0),
(2872, 5, '2016-09-26 03:27:55', '2016-09-26 03:27:55', '<span style="font-weight: 400;">The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the <img class="alignright  wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" />\r\nagenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright  wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright  wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" />mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright  wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps;</b>\r\n\r\n<b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar:</b>\r\n\r\n<b> The Arduous March Forward</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</span></li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, Destination Justice</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:27:55', '2016-09-26 03:27:55', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2873, 5, '2016-09-26 03:28:47', '2016-09-26 03:28:47', '<span style="font-weight: 400;">The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the <img class="alignright  wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright  wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright  wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" />mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright  wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps;</b>\r\n\r\n<b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar:</b>\r\n\r\n<b> The Arduous March Forward</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</span></li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, Destination Justice</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:28:47', '2016-09-26 03:28:47', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2874, 5, '2016-09-26 03:29:22', '2016-09-26 03:29:22', '<span style="font-weight: 400;">The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the <img class="alignright  wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright  wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright  wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright  wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps;</b>\r\n\r\n<b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar:</b>\r\n\r\n<b> The Arduous March Forward</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</span></li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, Destination Justice</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:29:22', '2016-09-26 03:29:22', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2875, 5, '2016-09-26 03:29:45', '2016-09-26 03:29:45', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright  wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright  wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright  wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright  wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps;</b>\r\n\r\n<b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar:</b>\r\n\r\n<b> The Arduous March Forward</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</span></li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, Destination Justice</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:29:45', '2016-09-26 03:29:45', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2876, 5, '2016-09-26 03:34:43', '2016-09-26 03:34:43', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                                      </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                                    </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                                 </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:34:43', '2016-09-26 03:34:43', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2877, 5, '2016-09-26 03:35:34', '2016-09-26 03:35:34', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                                      </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">\r\nMichael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    </b>\r\nAnna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                                    </b>\r\nDr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                                 </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:35:34', '2016-09-26 03:35:34', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2878, 5, '2016-09-26 03:36:21', '2016-09-26 03:36:21', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                                      </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                                    </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                                 </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:36:21', '2016-09-26 03:36:21', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2879, 5, '2016-09-26 03:38:52', '2016-09-26 03:38:52', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                                  </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                          </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                                    </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                  </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                                </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:38:52', '2016-09-26 03:38:52', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2880, 5, '2016-09-26 03:40:18', '2016-09-26 03:40:18', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                   </b>Michael J V White, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                           </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                     </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                   </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:40:18', '2016-09-26 03:40:18', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2881, 5, '2016-09-26 03:41:41', '2016-09-26 03:41:41', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                                       </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                   </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                              </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                               </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                          </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:41:41', '2016-09-26 03:41:41', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2882, 5, '2016-09-26 03:42:50', '2016-09-26 03:42:50', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                         </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                 </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                               </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                          </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:42:50', '2016-09-26 03:42:50', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2883, 5, '2016-09-26 03:43:25', '2016-09-26 03:43:25', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                      </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                    </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                               </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                          </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:43:25', '2016-09-26 03:43:25', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2884, 5, '2016-09-26 03:43:55', '2016-09-26 03:43:55', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                     </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                      </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                               </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                          </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:43:55', '2016-09-26 03:43:55', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2885, 5, '2016-09-26 03:44:20', '2016-09-26 03:44:20', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                         </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                                               </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                          </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:44:20', '2016-09-26 03:44:20', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2886, 5, '2016-09-26 03:45:04', '2016-09-26 03:45:04', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                             </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                          </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:45:04', '2016-09-26 03:45:04', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2887, 5, '2016-09-26 03:45:51', '2016-09-26 03:45:51', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    </b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                                       </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:45:51', '2016-09-26 03:45:51', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2888, 5, '2016-09-26 03:46:39', '2016-09-26 03:46:39', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                   </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:46:39', '2016-09-26 03:46:39', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2889, 5, '2016-09-26 03:47:24', '2016-09-26 03:47:24', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:47:24', '2016-09-26 03:47:24', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2890, 5, '2016-09-26 03:50:26', '2016-09-26 03:50:26', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  Celine Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:50:26', '2016-09-26 03:50:26', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2891, 5, '2016-09-26 03:51:02', '2016-09-26 03:51:02', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       </b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses                </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:51:02', '2016-09-26 03:51:02', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2892, 5, '2016-09-26 03:52:01', '2016-09-26 03:52:01', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses             </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:52:01', '2016-09-26 03:52:01', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2893, 5, '2016-09-26 03:52:42', '2016-09-26 03:52:42', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                                               </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia                                          </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:52:42', '2016-09-26 03:52:42', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2894, 5, '2016-09-26 03:53:26', '2016-09-26 03:53:26', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>Chautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>Celine Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:53:26', '2016-09-26 03:53:26', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2895, 5, '2016-09-26 03:54:11', '2016-09-26 03:54:11', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:54:11', '2016-09-26 03:54:11', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2896, 5, '2016-09-26 03:54:43', '2016-09-26 03:54:43', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                                                                    </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:54:43', '2016-09-26 03:54:43', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2897, 5, '2016-09-26 03:55:16', '2016-09-26 03:55:16', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>Gymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:55:16', '2016-09-26 03:55:16', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2898, 5, '2016-09-26 03:56:12', '2016-09-26 03:56:12', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 03:56:12', '2016-09-26 03:56:12', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
INSERT INTO `wp_posts` (`ID`, `post_author`, `post_date`, `post_date_gmt`, `post_content`, `post_title`, `post_excerpt`, `post_status`, `comment_status`, `ping_status`, `post_password`, `post_name`, `to_ping`, `pinged`, `post_modified`, `post_modified_gmt`, `post_content_filtered`, `post_parent`, `guid`, `menu_order`, `post_type`, `post_mime_type`, `comment_count`) VALUES
(2899, 5, '2016-09-26 04:11:00', '2016-09-26 04:11:00', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                                                                            \r\n</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement  </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 04:11:00', '2016-09-26 04:11:00', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2900, 5, '2016-09-26 04:12:52', '2016-09-26 04:12:52', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                               </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 04:12:52', '2016-09-26 04:12:52', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2901, 5, '2016-09-26 04:15:15', '2016-09-26 04:15:15', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                               \r\n</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">\r\nHesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement </b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 04:15:15', '2016-09-26 04:15:15', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2902, 5, '2016-09-26 04:16:23', '2016-09-26 04:16:23', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                               \r\n</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement \r\n\r\n</b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               </b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 04:16:23', '2016-09-26 04:16:23', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0),
(2903, 5, '2016-09-26 04:17:24', '2016-09-26 04:17:24', '<span style="font-weight: 400;"> <img class="alignright wp-image-2866" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2253-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2253" width="371" height="278" /> The UPR has been an effective mechanism for putting human rights issues on the agenda and engaging States in conversation about critical issues. However, systemic problems remain with regards to engagement with other stakeholders, the implementation by governments, the efficacy of follow up processes and the UPR’s ability to address hard political issues. These were key takeaways from Asia Centre’s conference, Universal Periodic Review in Southeast Asia: An Evidence-Based Regional Assessment, held from 15 to 17 September 2016 at Asia Centre’s premises in Bangkok.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Asia Centre Conferences: Designed For Discourse</b>\r\n\r\n<b><img class="wp-image-2865 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2172-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2172-001" width="280" height="210" /></b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The boutique conference was structured around thematic clusters on stakeholder involvement,  minority rights, civil and political freedoms and the death penalty. It included country specific discussions on Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Laos, Singapore, Myanmar, Brunei and Thailand. Researchers were provided 50 minute slots to present their findings and in order to ensure adequate discussion time. A complete list of presenters and their individual topics is available at the end of the this report. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day One: The Conversation Is Key</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The first day of the conference saw over 30 participants from a diverse backgrounds <img class="alignright wp-image-2867" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2200-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2200" width="323" height="242" />including members of civil society organisation, national human rights institutions, academia, the United Nations, as well as students. Some of the key discussion points to emerge from the first day of discourse, included the value of the UPR as a platform for dialogue, interaction with other UN and regional human rights <img class="alignright wp-image-2868" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2259-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2259-001" width="322" height="242" /> mechanism, patterns of enhanced CSO engagement with the process as well as the role that other stakeholders such national human rights institutions can play in monitoring the implementation of recommendations. There were also issue specific discussions on the role of the UPR in pushing for the abolition of the death penalty and the efficacy of the process in addressing past human rights abuses in Timor-Leste. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Day Two: Emerging Patterns &amp; Trends in Engagement</b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2869 alignleft" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2416-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2416" width="343" height="257" />The second day of the conference saw more in-depth discussion on how specific countries were engaging on contentious issues. This covered freedom of expression in Thailand, freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia and civil and political rights in Singapore. The discussion on how minority rights were raised under the UPR centred on the experiences of the Hmong community in Laos as well as a regional overview of the particular challenges faced by LGBTIQ human rights defenders prepared by Destination Justice. One critical discussion point on day two <img class="alignright wp-image-2870" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IP-1-1140x855.jpg" alt="IP (1)" width="328" height="246" />was the approach to engagement, with the Lutheran World Federation backing making the most of the non-confrontational nature of the dialogue to push for solutions rather than naming and shaming. The plenary session provided an overview of emerging patterns and trends in interaction with the UPR such as greater CSO participation and coalition building efforts.It also called into question the efficacy of mid-term reporting and follow up processes. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? </b>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;"><img class="wp-image-2871 alignright" src="http://asiacentre.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IMG_2542-001-1140x855.jpg" alt="IMG_2542-001" width="338" height="253" />The final day of the conference was an open forum discussion titled Southeast Asia &amp; the UPR: All Talk &amp; No Action? This session was open to members of the public and it attracted an audience over 25 people. The panel featured Imesh Pokharel from Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights(OHCHR) Regional Office Bangkok, Michael J V White from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission, Celine Martin from Destination Justice and</span>\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Gymbay Moua from the World Congress of Hmong People. The panelists shared their first hand experiences of engaging with the UPR process, highlighting key challenges faced and offering input on some of the best practices from their respective organisations. It was a very interactive discussion, moderated by Asia Centre’s Robin Ramcharan and it provided a unique entry point into the UPR for members of the public who were interested in understanding the process. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall Asia Centre’s inaugural conference was successful in creating a platform for participatory discourse among different stakeholders who are actively engaged in with the UPR. It provided all present the opportunity to identify trends and patterns of engagement with the UPR over the two cycles and providing a critical analysis of the UPR’s achievement in Southeast Asia. There was also discussion of establishing an evidence-based UPR network with the conference participants forming a core. </span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style="font-weight: 400;">The conference proceedings will be compiled into an edited volume which can inform engagement in the third cycle. It is set to be launched in the first quarter of 2017.</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<b>List of presenters &amp; topics</b>\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li><b>Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps; </b><b>Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to its Promise?                                   </b>Michael J V White, <span style="font-weight: 400;">New Zealand Human Rights Commission</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>A Statistical Overview: Submissions and Participation of CSOs in Southeast Asia                                                                                                    \r\n</b>Anna Jeffries, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Analysis of CSO Participation in the UPR                                           </b>Dr.James Gomez &amp; Dr.Robin Ramcharan, Asia Centre</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Assessing Suhakam’s Effectiveness in Bridging the Implementation Gap of Malaysia’s Universal Periodic Review                                         </b>Dr. Khoo Ying Hooi, University of Malaya</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Shy but Growing Role of the UPR Recommendations in Fostering the Protecting Role of the AICHR in Southeast Asia                 </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">  \r\nCeline Martin, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aix-Marseille University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Universal Periodic Review and the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and Myanmar: </b><b>The Arduous March Forward       \r\n</b>M Ravi, Human Rights Advocate</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Universal Periodic Review in Timor-Leste and the Government''s Failure of Achieving Justice for the Past Human Rights Abuses   </b>Cristian Talesco, Hong Kong Polytechnic University</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Advocating the Untouchable Issue Through the UPR: Freedom of Expression in Thailand                                                       </b>\r\nChautimas Suksai, Researcher &amp; Consultant</li>\r\n 	<li><b>The Situation of LGBTIQ HRDs in Southeast Asia               </b>\r\nCeline Martin, Destination Justice</li>\r\n 	<li><b>UPR &amp; The Rights of Minorities                           </b>\r\nGymbay Moua, Congress of World Hmong People</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Indonesia and the Universal Periodic Review: Analysis of Freedom of Religion and Belief                                               \r\n</b><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hesty Dewi Maria Siagian ,</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bogor Agricultural University</span></li>\r\n 	<li><b>Maximize the Effectiveness of the UPR Process in Myanmar:  A Non-Confrontational, Solutions-Focused and Evidence-Based Involvement \r\n\r\n</b>Francesca Paola Traglia, The Lutheran World Federation - Myanmar Program</li>\r\n 	<li><b>Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review: Civil Society Perspectives               \r\n</b>Dr. James Gomez,Bangkok University &amp; Michelle D’cruz, Mahidol University</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n&nbsp;', 'UPR Conference Report', '', 'inherit', 'closed', 'closed', '', '2864-revision-v1', '', '', '2016-09-26 04:17:24', '2016-09-26 04:17:24', '', 2864, 'http://asiacentre.co.th/other/2864-revision-v1/', 0, 'revision', '', 0);
